Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ghobrial v. Elnashfan

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson

December 24, 2018

Shari Ghobrial, Plaintiff,
v.
Wahid Elnashfan, Defendant.

          ORDER

          Hon. Marybeth Rogers, J.S.C.

         THIS MATTER having come before this Court by defendant, Wahid Elnashfan, Pro Se ("Defendant") by way of a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order of October 29, 2018, and upon notice to plaintiff Shari Ghobrial, Pro Se ("Plaintiff), and Plaintiff having filed an Opposition to Defendant's Motion on November 26, 2018; and the Court having considered the papers submitted and arguments therein; and good cause having been shown;

         It is on this 24th day of December, 2018:

         ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED for the reasons stated below; and it is further

         ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served by Wahid Elnashfan, Pro Se, upon all interested parties within seven (7) days of the date of this Order.

         Defendant, Wahid Elnashfan ("Defendant") Moves for reconsideration of the Order entered by the Hon. Marybeth Rogers, J.S.C., on October 29, 2018. Plaintiff Shari Ghobrial ("Plaintiff) Opposes Defendant's Motion.

         Facts

         1. On July 19, 2018 Plaintiff filed a Complaint.

         2. On August 27, 2018 Defendant filed an Answer and Counterclaim.

         3. On October 29, 2018 the Court entered an Order in favor of Plaintiff, directing Defendant to pay Plaintiff $4, 500 plus Court costs, and dismissing Defendant's Counterclaim with Prejudice.

         4. On October 30, 2018 Defendant filed the instant Motion for Reconsideration, 5. On November 26, 2018 Plaintiff filed an Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration.

         Defendant's Contentions

         Defendant states that Plaintiff has failed to serve Defendant with a copy of the Court's Order entered on October 29, 2018, which directed Plaintiff to serve a copy of the Order within ten days of entry of the Order. Defendant accordingly requests that the Court dismiss the ruling.

         Alternatively, Defendant requests that the Court reconsider the Court's prior Order. Defendant states that the Court overlooked numerous facts that cannot be reconciled with the Court's Opinion. Defendant first points out Plaintiffs claim that Plaintiff paid Defendant $9, 000 in cash in advance. Defendant notes that Plaintiffs explanation for the advance payment was to meet a Fannie Mae deadline that would allow Plaintiff to live in Plaintiffs home by May of 2017. However, according to Defendant, Plaintiff stated that Plaintiff paid Defendant in August of 2017. Defendant notes that Plaintiff advised the Judge that Plaintiff suffered no penalties or problems due to the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.