Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cannon v. Ashburn Corp.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey, Camden Vicinage

June 7, 2018

KYLE CANNON, LEWIS LYONS, and DIANE LYONS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
v.
ASHBURN CORPORATION, WINES ‘TIL SOLD OUT WTSO.COM, and JONATHAN H. NEWMAN, Defendants.

          CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. James E. Cecchi, Esq. Lindsey H. Taylor, Esq. and GISKAN SOLOTAROFF ANDERSON LLP Oren Giskan, Esq. Counsel for Plaintiffs

          MANKO, GOLD, KATCHER & FOX, LLP By: Suzanne Ilene Schiller, Esq. Nicole R. Moshang, Esq. James M. McClammer, Esq. LATHAM & WATKINS LLP James J. Farrell, Esq. Gregory Mortenson, Esq. Counsel for Defendants

          U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CONSUMER PROTECTION BRANCH Gustav W. Eyler, Esq. Joshua D. Rothman, Esq. Counsel for Interested Party the United States

          MARK BRNOVICH, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA Oramel H. Skinner, Esq.Counsel for Amicus Curiae Arizona Attorney General on behalf of the Attorneys General of Arizona, Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming

          FINEMAN, KREKSTEIN & HARRIS, P.C. Richard J. Perr, Esq. Monica M. Littman, Esq. MANSOUR GAVIN LPA Brendon P. Friesen, Esq. Kenneth E. Smith, Esq. Counsel for Objectors Derek Hansen, Vytauras Sasnauskas, and Ryan Russell

          DILWORTH PAXSON LLP Joshua Wolson, Esq.COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE Adam Schulman, Esq. Counsel for Objector Ryan Radia

          EDWARD TAHIR DUCKETT, pro se

          PATRICK DEAN TAYLOR, pro se

          STEVEN D. MAYER, pro se

          WILLIAM B. JAMES, pro se

          KENDALL M. COX, pro se

          KEITH BROWN, pro se

          MARI STULL, pro se

          OPINION

          RENÉE MARIE BUMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's opinion and order of April 17, 2018 denying final settlement approval of this putative class action suit. For the reasons stated herein, the motion will be denied.

         I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

         The opinion at issue is available at Cannon v. Ashburn Corp., No. CV 16-1452 (RMB/AMD), 2018 WL 1806046 (D.N.J. Apr. 17, 2018). Notably, while that opinion decided the parties' joint motion for settlement approval, only Plaintiffs move for reconsideration. Defendant has filed no ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.