United States District Court, D. New Jersey, Camden Vicinage
KYLE CANNON, LEWIS LYONS, and DIANE LYONS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
ASHBURN CORPORATION, WINES ‘TIL SOLD OUT WTSO.COM, and JONATHAN H. NEWMAN, Defendants.
CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C.
James E. Cecchi, Esq. Lindsey H. Taylor, Esq. and GISKAN
SOLOTAROFF ANDERSON LLP Oren Giskan, Esq. Counsel for
GOLD, KATCHER & FOX, LLP By: Suzanne Ilene Schiller, Esq.
Nicole R. Moshang, Esq. James M. McClammer, Esq. LATHAM &
WATKINS LLP James J. Farrell, Esq. Gregory Mortenson, Esq.
Counsel for Defendants
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CONSUMER PROTECTION BRANCH Gustav W.
Eyler, Esq. Joshua D. Rothman, Esq. Counsel for Interested
Party the United States
BRNOVICH, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA Oramel H.
Skinner, Esq.Counsel for Amicus Curiae Arizona Attorney
General on behalf of the Attorneys General of Arizona,
Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan,
Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma,
Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas,
Washington, and Wyoming
FINEMAN, KREKSTEIN & HARRIS, P.C. Richard J. Perr, Esq.
Monica M. Littman, Esq. MANSOUR GAVIN LPA Brendon P. Friesen,
Esq. Kenneth E. Smith, Esq. Counsel for Objectors Derek
Hansen, Vytauras Sasnauskas, and Ryan Russell
DILWORTH PAXSON LLP Joshua Wolson, Esq.COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE
INSTITUTE Adam Schulman, Esq. Counsel for Objector Ryan Radia
TAHIR DUCKETT, pro se
PATRICK DEAN TAYLOR, pro se
D. MAYER, pro se
WILLIAM B. JAMES, pro se
KENDALL M. COX, pro se
BROWN, pro se
STULL, pro se
RENÉE MARIE BUMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for
Reconsideration of the Court's opinion and order of April
17, 2018 denying final settlement approval of this putative
class action suit. For the reasons stated herein, the motion
will be denied.
opinion at issue is available at Cannon v. Ashburn
Corp., No. CV 16-1452 (RMB/AMD), 2018 WL 1806046 (D.N.J.
Apr. 17, 2018). Notably, while that opinion decided the
parties' joint motion for settlement approval, only
Plaintiffs move for reconsideration. Defendant has filed no