United States District Court, D. New Jersey
GOLDA D. HARRIS, Plaintiff,
ERIC BENNET, et al, Defendants.
OPINION & ORDER
MICHAEL VAZQUEZ U.S.D.J.
case comes before the Court on Plaintiff Golda D. Harris'
motion for reconsideration of this Court's Order
dismissing her Complaint with prejudice. D.E. 70, 65.
Plaintiffs Complaint alleges she was wrongly terminated from
public housing in Plainfield, New Jersey. The Court reviewed
submissions made in support of the motion and considered the
motion without oral argument pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b)
and L. Civ. R. 78.1(b). For the reasons that follow, the
Plaintiffs motion is DENIED.
Background & Procedural History
factual background of this case is taken from this
Court's May 2, 2017 Opinion denying Plaintiffs motion for
default and summary judgment, and dismissing the Complaint.
D.E. 64. The crux of Plaintiff s allegations is that
Defendants wrongfully evicted Plaintiff from her home without
due process in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1427d(k) and 42
U.S.C. § 1983. Complaint ("Compl.") at
¶¶2, 6. In Plaintiffs "statement of claims,
" she alleges that
1. Defendants Bennett, Wood, Sutton and Smith did not allow
or give notice to Plaintiff of the notice of termination or
the grievance process, even after plaintiff requested it.
2. The above defendants did not follow the HUD grievance
procedures concerning eviction and tenancy terminations.
3. The above defendants denied plaintiff an opportunity to
file a timely appeal or any appeal.
4. The defendants did not provide safety maintenance and
insurance on the premises causing plaintiff injuries, debts,
5. The defendants perjured affidavits to avoid
responsibility, restitution, compensation, and discovery.
6.1 reserve the right to amend the claims.
Compl. at ¶6. The relief Plaintiff seeks, as quoted
directly from the Complaint, states as follows:
1. Removal of LT-801-09 and LT-9518-08 to district