United States District Court, D. New Jersey
July 28, 2015
MR. RENE DALLAS EDWARDS, Plaintiff,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.
MR. RENE DALLAS EDWARDS, Appearing pro se.
LAUREN ELIZABETH MYERS, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, NEW YORK, NY, On behalf of defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NOEL L. HILLMAN, District Judge.
This matter having come before the Court pursuant to the complaint filed by plaintiff, Mr. Rene Dallas Edwards, against the Social Security Administration seeking disability benefits that he believes he is entitled to; and
When plaintiff filed his complaint, he was incarcerated and no longer receiving the disability benefits he had been receiving prior to his incarceration for over twelve years; and
Plaintiff complaining that he required the benefits while in prison because of the dearth of basic services provided by the prison due to his inability to pay for additional services; and
Plaintiff also complaining that because he was assaulted by another inmate he has become even more disabled; and
The SSA Commissioner having filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint, pointing out that pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 402(x)(1)(A), "no monthly benefits shall be paid under this section or under section 423 of this title to any individual for any month ending with or during or beginning with or during a period of more than 30 days throughout all of which such individual-(i) is confined in a jail, prison, or other penal institution or correctional facility pursuant to his conviction of a criminal offense"; and
The SSA Commissioner also having also pointed out that to the extent that plaintiff was challenging any decisions made by the SSA, he is required to exhaust his administrative remedies before he can bring an action in federal court regarding the SSA's decisions, and plaintiff has not done so, see 42 U.S.C. § 402(g) ("Any individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Commissioner of Social Security may allow. Such action shall be brought in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides."); and
The SSA Commissioner also having noted that except as provided by § 402(g), plaintiff is barred from bringing suit against the SSA, see 42 U.S.C. § 402(h) ("The findings and decision of the Commissioner of Social Security after a hearing shall be binding upon all individuals who were parties to such hearing. No findings of fact or decision of the Commissioner of Social Security shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as herein provided. No action against the United States, the Commissioner of Social Security, or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under section 1331 or 1346 of Title 28 to recover on any claim arising under this subchapter."); and
The Court recognizing that plaintiff feels that he requires the reinstatement of his benefits, along with increased benefits due to his greater disability; but
The Court finding that plaintiff's current complaint is not the appropriate vehicle to obtain redress for his concerns and requests, because §§ 402(x)(1)(A), 402(g), and 402(h) require the dismissal of plaintiff's complaint;
IT IS on this 27th day of July, 2015
ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint  be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED the other pending motions [2, 4, 13, 16, 25] are DENIED AS MOOT; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark this matter as CLOSED.