Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Witherspoon v. Jamtime Studios, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey

September 17, 2014

DESMND WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff,
v.
JAMTIME STUDIOS, INC., Defendant.

OPINION

STANLEY R. CHESLER, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the application filed by Plaintiff Desmond Witherspoon ("Plaintiff" or "Witherspoon") to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of fees, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Based on Plaintiff's affidavit of indigence, the Court finds that Plaintiff qualifies for in forma pauperis status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and will direct that the Complaint be filed. However, for the reasons set forth below, the Complaint must be dismissed.

The Court has an independent obligation to satisfy itself of subject matter jurisdiction over an action. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ward Trucking Corp. , 48 F.3d 742, 750 (3d Cir. 1995). In keeping with that obligation, the Court has reviewed Witherspoon's Complaint. Witherspoon has filed this action seeking a total of $885, 000 in unpaid wages from Defendant Jamtime Studios. Other than identifying the Defendant as a "recording studio based out of Florida, " the Complaint contains no information regarding the citizenship of the parties. Nor does it appear from the Complaint that a federal question is stated. Based on such insufficient information, the Court cannot satisfy itself that it has subject matter ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.