United States District Court, D. New Jersey
JOHN W. FINK, Plaintiff,
JONATHAN L. BISHOP, KAYDON A. STANZIONE, JOSEPH M. TROUPE, GE BETZ, INC., STEVEN W. DAVIS, PRAXIS TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, PRAXIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
NOEL L. HILLMAN, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court is Plaintiff's cross motion [Doc. No. 16] to amend for leave to file the proposed second amended complaint [Doc. No. 16-1] in this action; and
The Court noting that only Defendants GE Betz, Inc. and Steven Davis and ADT Security Services, Inc. filed specific oppositions [Doc. Nos. 31, 33] to Plaintiff's cross motion to amend addressing the contents of the proposed second amended complaint; and
The Court having undertaken a paragraph by paragraph review of the proposed second amended complaint and the original complaint [Doc. No. 1] and the first amended complaint [Doc. No. 4],  and noting that paragraphs 1 through 112 of the proposed second amended complaint are virtually identical to paragraphs 1 through 104 of the original complaint; and
The Court further noting that all of the claims set forth in the proposed second amended complaint stem from Plaintiff's assertion that Defendants participated in the "conversion of assets from" non-party Advanced Logic Systems, Inc. ("ALSI"),  in which Plaintiff maintains a security interest, subsequently concealed this conversion of assets, defrauded Plaintiff of his rights to these assets, and caused Plaintiff to suffer in excess of $75 million in damages, (see Proposed Second Amended Compl. [Doc. No. 16-1] ¶ 1); and
The Court noting that Plaintiff is a familiar litigant to this Court having filed multiple suits in addition to the present action including 1:09-cv-05078-NLH-KMW, Fink v. Edgelink, Inc., et al.; 1:12-cv-04125-NLH-KMW, Fink v. Kirchner, et al.; and 1:12-cv-04479, In Re Advanced Logic Systems, Inc., a bankruptcy appeal; and
The Court observing that in both the Edgelink matter and the ALSI bankruptcy appeal, Fink's primary contention was that valuable technology and assets of ALSI were fraudulently transferred out of that company and converted to the detriment of Plaintiff's security interest in those assets; and
The Court having previously determined in both the Edgelink matter and the ALSI bankruptcy appeal that Fink provided no evidence that these ALSI assets he maintained a security interest in were fraudulently transferred or converted, and the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit having affirmed this Court's rulings in both the Edgelink matter and the ALSI bankruptcy appeal by Opinion dated January 21, 2014; and
The Court finding that in light of Plaintiff's representation that the claims in the present matter primarily arise out of his continuing belief that ALSI assets were fraudulently transferred and converted by various individuals and business entities - a belief which this Court has repeatedly found lacks sufficient evidence, it is necessary to conduct a show cause hearing in this matter requiring Plaintiff to demonstrate how the claims asserted in any iteration of the complaint in this action: (1) are not otherwise barred by issue preclusion, claim preclusion, or New Jersey's entire controversy doctrine; and (2) are not in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)(1) and 11(b)(3); and
The Court further finding that while leave to amend should be freely given when justice so requires pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, leave cannot be granted until these issues are resolved.
IT IS on this 30th day of June, 2014
ORDERED that Plaintiff's cross motion to amend [Doc. No. 16] shall be, and hereby is, DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff is directed to appear before this Court at 3:00 p.m. on Monday, July 21, 2014 in Courtroom 3A of the Mitchell H. Cohen United States Courthouse, 400 Cooper Street, Camden, New Jersey, 08102 and show cause why the instant matter should be ...