Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Wise

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

November 22, 2013

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant,
v.
JEROD K. WISE, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Submitted October 1, 2013

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment No. 10-05-1273.

Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant/cross-respondent (Jason A. Coe, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the brief).

John J. Hoffman, Acting Attorney General, attorney for respondent/cross-appellant (Jenny M. Hsu, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

Appellant/cross-respondent filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Before Judges Messano and Hayden.

PER CURIAM

Following a jury trial, defendant Jerod K. Wise was convicted of the first-degree murder of Curtis Johnson, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3(a)(1) and (2), and acquitted of fourth-degree possession of a knife, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-5d, and third-degree possession of a knife for an unlawful purpose, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-4d. The judge sentenced defendant to imprisonment for life, with a thirty-five year period of parole ineligibility.

Defendant raises the following points on appeal:
POINT I
THE TRIAL COURT ERRONEOUSLY FAILED TO INSTRUCT THE JURY ON THE LESSER-INCLUDED OFFENSE OF PASSION-PROVOCATION MANSLAUGHTER. (Not raised below)
POINT II
THE STATE'S INTRODUCTION OF OVER 20 PHOTOGRAPHS OF BLOODSTAINS, AS WELL AS THE BLOODY T-SHIRT RECOVERED FROM THE SCENE, WERE NOT PROBATIVE OF ANY DISPUTED ISSUE AND WERE HIGHLY PREJUDICIAL. (Not raised below)
POINT III
THE TRIAL COURT'S SENTENCING ANALYSIS WAS INADEQUATE AND [DEFENDANT]'S SENTENCE WAS EXCESSIVE.
A. The Trial Court Erred In Finding Aggravating Factor #2 Because The Victim's Death Is an Essential Element of Murder.
B. The Court Should Have Found Mitigating Factor #3.
POINT IV
[DEFENDANT]'S 35-YEAR PAROLE DISQUALIFIER IS LAWFUL AND CANNOT BE INCREASED ON REMAND.[1]

The State has cross-appealed. It argues that the sentence imposed was illegal because the period of parole ineligibility did not comply with the mandatory requirements of the No Early Release Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7.2 (NERA).

We have considered these arguments in light of the record and applicable legal standards. We affirm defendant's conviction for murder. We vacate the sentence imposed and remand the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.