Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Empco Contracting, Inc.

United States District Court, Third Circuit

October 23, 2013

UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff,
v.
EMPCO CONTRACTING, INC., et al., Defendants.

OPINION & ORDER

FAITH S. HOCHBERG, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon Utica Mutual Insurance Company's ("Utica" or "Plaintiff") Motion for Default Judgment [Dkt. No. 29] pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b). This motion is unopposed. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Utica's Motion for Default Judgment against defendant Empco Contracting, Inc. This Court has considered the submissions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78; and

it appearing that Utica filed its Complaint on September 19, 2012 [Dkt. No. 1] alleging, inter alia, breach of contract due to Empco Contracting, Inc.'s failure to indemnify; and

it appearing that Utica served summons and complaint on Empco Contracting, Inc. on October 2, 2012 [Dkt. No. 5]; and

it appearing that Empco Contracting, Inc. failed to answer or defend this action in any manner; and

it appearing that Utica requested entry of default on December 10, 2012 [Dkt. No. 9] and the Clerk of the Court entered default as to Empco Contracting, Inc. the same day [Dkt. No. 10]; and

it appearing that Utica served this Motion for Default Judgment on defendant Empco Contracting, Inc. on September 16, 2013 [Dkt. No. 29-11]; and

it appearing that despite the time to do so having passed, and defendant Empco Contracting, Inc. has not filed any response or opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment; and

it appearing that the proof submitted by Plaintiff establishes that Empco Contracting, Inc. agreed to indemnify Utica, jointly and severally, for any and all damages, costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred as a result of claims under any surety bonds issued to Empco or in enforcing the terms of the indemnity agreement;[1] and

it appearing that the proof submitted by Plaintiff establishes that Utica issued several performance, labor, union, and material bonds to Empco in connection with Empco's work at various construction projects; and

it appearing the proof submitted by Plaintiff establishes that Utica began receiving claims from Empco's subcontractors and suppliers under the labor and material bonds; and

it appearing the proof submitted by Plaintiff establishes that Utica retained Beacon Consulting Group, Inc. to provide assistance in investigating the claims as well as to ensure that the contract funds were utilized for the payment of project-related costs and expenses; and

it appearing that Empco notified Utica that it would not be able to continue performance of its construction work; and

it appearing that the proof submitted by Plaintiff establishes that Utica suffered a loss of $1, 100, 994.31 for the settlement of bond claims, finishing the project work, and paying counsel and consulting fees incurred in connection ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.