September 4, 2013
ESMELYN PLUNKETT, Plaintiff,
INGLEMOOR REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER et al., Defendants.
OPINION & ORDER
STANLEY R. CHESLER, District Judge.
This motion comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), for failure to state a valid claim for relief, by Defendants Inglemoor Rehabilitation and Care Center and Steve Izzo (collectively, "Defendants"). For the reasons stated below, the motion to dismiss will be granted.
Defendants move to dismiss the Amended Complaint on the ground that the claims asserted are barred by the statute of limitations. In her opposition brief, Plaintiff concedes that Defendants are correct. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss will be granted.
Plaintiff argues, however, that she has an unasserted but viable claim for employment discrimination in violation of New Jersey's Law against Discrimination, and seeks leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. While Defendants oppose Plaintiff's request, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) instructs: "The court should freely give leave when justice so requires." Defendants have failed to persuade this Court that granting leave to amend is futile or unjust. Plaintiff will be given leave to amend the Amended Complaint for the limited purpose of asserting a claim for employment discrimination in violation of New Jersey's Law against Discrimination. Of course, the Second Amended Complaint must plead sufficient facts to satisfy the pleading requirements of Iqbal.
For these reasons,
IT IS on this 4th day of September, 2013, hereby
ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (Docket Entry No. 18) is GRANTED, and the Amended Complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within 30 days of the entry of this Order.