Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

James K. Ford v. the State of New Jersey

September 4, 2012

JAMES K. FORD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Freda L. Wolfson United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION

IT APPEARING THAT:

1. On August 7, 2012, this Court entered an Opinion and Order (docket entry nos. 2 & 3) to deny Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis and to administratively terminate the matter.

2. On August 9, 2012, the Clerk of the Court received for filing from Plaintiff a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (docket entry no. 4).

3. Plaintiff's motion does not appear to be a response to Opinion and Order of August 7, 2012, nor has Plaintiff cured the defects of his initial filing.

4. Since this case is currently administratively terminated and does not have an active docket, Plaintiff's motion is moot.

5. As noted in the Court's initial opinion, while Plaintiff James K. Ford mentioned his brother Elijah D. Ford in the initial filing, Elijah D. Ford is not listed in the caption of the Complaint. Further, Elijah D. Ford did not pay the filing fee or make a request to proceed in forma pauperis. However, given this subsequent filing, it appears that Plaintiff James K. Ford intends for his brother Elijah D. Ford to be a named Plaintiff in this matter. However, Elijah D. Ford has not made any request to proceed in forma pauperis on his own behalf. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (April 26, 1996) (the "PLRA"), which amends 28 U.S.C. § 1915, establishes certain financial requirements for prisoners who are attempting to bring a civil action or file an appeal in forma pauperis. Under the PLRA, a prisoner bringing a civil action in forma pauperis must submit an affidavit, including a statement of all assets, which states that the prisoner is unable to pay the fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). See Hagan

v. Rogers, 570 F.3d 146 (3d Cir. 2009)(litigants proceeding as joint plaintiffs are subject to $350.00 assessment each if they proceed in forma pauperis).

6. To the extent that Elijah D. Ford intends to be a party to this litigation, his application to proceed in forma pauperis shall be denied.

It is on this 4th day of September , 2012,

ORDERED that the Clerk shall reopen this matter by making a new and separate entry on the docket reading "CIVIL CASE REOPENED"; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the

Pleadings (docket entry no. 4) is deemed moot; and it is further

ORDERED that, to the to the extent that Elijah D. Ford intends to be a party to this litigation, his application to proceed in forma ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.