Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Claus Peter Speth v. Robert Goode

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY


August 9, 2012

CLAUS PETER SPETH, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROBERT GOODE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Jerome B. Simandle

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Docket Item 207] and Plaintiff's application under Rule 56(d) [Docket Item 214]; the Court having considered the submissions of the parties in support thereof and opposition thereto; for the reasons stated in the Opinion of today's date; and for good cause shown;

IT IS this 9th day of August , 2012 hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for deferral of the due date for Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and it is further ORDERED that, if the Magistrate Judge determines that Plaintiff is entitled to additional discovery upon the pending privilege motion [Docket Item 203], Plaintiff's opposition will be due fourteen (14) days after discovery is provided. However, if the Magistrate Judge denies additional discovery in the pending privilege motion, Plaintiff's opposition will be due fourteen (14) days after entry of the Magistrate Judge's decision; Plaintiff should be prepared to meet this deadline because no further extension will be granted.

JEROME B. SIMANDLE

Chief U.S. District Judge

20120809

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.