Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State of New Jersey v. Terrell M. Owens

July 16, 2012


On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Indictment No. 08-04-0738.

Per curiam.


Submitted May 15, 2012

Before Judges Messano and Espinosa.

Following a jury trial, defendant Terrell M. Owens was convicted of third-degree theft, N.J.S.A. 2C:20-3, and fourth-degree falsifying or tampering with records, N.J.S.A. 2C:21-4. The evidence at trial revealed that defendant was employed as the Teaneck branch manager of the Fairleigh Dickinson University Credit Union (the Credit Union), having assumed that position temporarily at the end of November 2007 when the prior manager resigned. Part of defendant's duties included reconciling the actual amount of cash in the Credit Union's vault with the computerized account ledger.

The only other employee at the Teaneck branch was a part-time teller, Melanie Lerner. Lerner did not have the security code or key to open the branch, nor did she have the access code to the vault where the branch's cash was kept. Lerner believed she was never in the vault alone. Records disclosed that only defendant's access code was used to open and close the Teaneck branch between January 2, 2008 and January 18, 2008.

Shareatha Owens, the operations officer at the Credit Union's Madison and Teaneck branches, audited the money in the vault of the Teaneck branch in November 2007, prior to defendant's assuming the position of manager.*fn1 At that time, all money at the branch was accounted for. Thereafter, defendant called her "[a]lmost everyday" because of problems he had balancing the vault cash, but he never indicated any money was missing.

On January 18, 2008, Shareatha was doing a "weekly cash order," i.e., seeing how much cash was actually on hand and making sure it was adequate to service the Credit Union's customers. She accessed the computerized ledger system and noticed entries totaling $9700 in the balance sheet's "nondenominational field." This field represented money that physically existed but was damaged and needed to be removed from circulation. Shareatha testified that in her many years of experience with the Credit Union, the aggregate amount in the nondenominational field was about $500.

She called defendant and asked if he made these entries. He admitted that he had done so in order to balance the vault. Shareatha explained that if the damaged money was removed from the computerized ledger, the vault would necessarily be short, and she directed defendant to "recount his vault and to call [her] back." Shareatha reported the problem to the Credit Union's Chief Executive Officer, Judith Kehres, and proceeded to the Teaneck branch with her fellow employee and defendant's direct supervisor, Ayeisha Robinson.

When they arrived, defendant "appeared fidgety and nervous." Shareatha noticed that the video recording system was not recording, even though she had personally checked the system in November 2007 when the prior manager resigned, and it was working properly. She also noticed that the video camera was no longer pointed toward the vault, but rather toward an area between the vault and the ATM machine. The two women counted the actual cash in the vault and in the teller's drawers and discovered "[a] little over twelve thousand dollars" was missing. Shareatha reported this to Kehres, and the police were notified.

Detective Seth Kriegel responded to the Credit Union and interviewed defendant at police headquarters. Defendant claimed that he did not know what happened to the missing money and that he had spoken to Shareatha about the shortfall.

Lerner testified that she never accessed the computer ledger regarding the monies in the vault and never entered any amounts in the "nondenominational" field. She denied taking any money from the branch.

Kehres read portions of a letter defendant sent to the National Credit Union Administration, the government agency that monitors and insures credit unions, dated April 29, 2008. Defendant claimed that he noticed shortfalls in deliveries of cash from the Federal Reserve as soon as he arrived at the Teaneck branch and "was ignored" when he reported them. Kehres testified that defendant was supposed to notify her whenever a "cash delivery" was incorrect, but he never did.

Defendant's motion for a judgment of acquittal, Rule 3:18-1, was denied and Robinson testified as a defense witness. Robinson shared an office with Shareatha in the Madison branch of the Credit Union. She claimed that defendant called in early January because he was "missing a significant amount of money." She transferred him to Shareatha but could not hear the conversation. Later, though she could not specify the date, Robinson ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.