UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
July 13, 2012
HUGH JOSEPHS, JR. PLAINTIFF,
ADMIN-CHRISTOPHER WARREN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Freda L. Wolfson United States District Judge
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiff Hugh Josephs, Jr., currently confined at New Jersey State Prison in Trenton, New Jersey, seeks to bring a civil action in forma pauperis,*fn1 without prepayment of fees or security, asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act"), which amends 28 U.S.C. § 1915, establishes certain financial requirements for prisoners who are attempting to bring a civil action in forma pauperis.
Under the Act, a prisoner bringing a civil action in forma pauperis must submit an affidavit, including a statement of all assets, which states that the prisoner is unable to pay the fee.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The prisoner also must submit a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The prisoner must obtain this statement from the appropriate official of each prison at which he was or is confined. Id.
Even if the prisoner is granted in forma pauperis status, the prisoner must pay the full amount of the $350.00 filing fee.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). In each month that the amount in the prisoner's account exceeds $10.00, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid, the agency having custody of the prisoner shall assess, deduct from the prisoner's account, and forward to the Clerk of the Court payment equal to 20% of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
Plaintiff may not have known when he submitted his complaint that he must pay the filing fee, and that even if the full filing fee, or any part of it, has been paid, the Court must dismiss the case if it finds that the action is: (1) frivolous or malicious;
(2) fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or
(3) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). If the Court dismisses the case for any of these reasons, the Act does not permit the prisoner to get his filing fee back.
If the prisoner has, on three or more prior occasions while incarcerated, brought an action or appeal in a court that was dismissed on any of the grounds listed above, he cannot bring another action in forma pauperis unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
In the currently pending matter, Plaintiff did not submit any documents in support of an in forma pauperis application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), (2), nor did he prepay the $350.00 filing fee.
The Court additionally notes that Plaintiff has used an outof-date Complaint form which states that the filing fee is $150.00. To the contrary, the filing fee for a civil action is $350.00. If Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this action, the Court may enter an Order assessing the $350.00 filing fee and directing that assessments be withdrawn from Plaintiff's prison account until the $350.00 filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
Further, the Complaint submitted by Plaintiff is unsigned. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a) (An unsigned paper must be stricken unless promptly corrected).
Finally, Plaintiff has included with his filing a document which appears to be a copy of a the first page of a request for appointment of counsel in a prior matter. It is unclear whether Plaintiff seeks appointment of counsel in this matter. Even if the inclusion of this document were to be construed as a request for appointment of counsel in this matter, the request is deficient to show that appointment of counsel would be warranted in this matter. Should Plaintiff wish to seek appointment of counsel in this matter, he must file an application for the appointment of pro bono counsel setting forth support for his request in accordance with the factors set forth in Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147 (3d Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1196 (1994).
This Court expresses no opinion, at this time, as to whether this action is subject to dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or otherwise.
THEREFORE, it is on this 13th day of July , 2012; ORDERED that, to the extent that Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis, that application is hereby DENIED, without prejudice; and it is further
ORDERED that, to the extent that Plaintiff seeks appointment of counsel, that application is hereby DENIED, without prejudice; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this case, without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee; Plaintiff is informed that administrative termination is not a "dismissal" for purposes of the statute of limitations, and that if the case is reopened, it is not subject to the statute of limitations time bar if it was originally filed timely, see Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988)(prisoner mailbox rule); McDowell v. Delaware State Police, 88 F.3d 188, 191 (3d Cir. 1996); see also Williams-Guice v. Board of Education, 45 F.3d 161, 163 (7th Cir. 1995); and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a blank form application to proceed in forma pauperis; and it is further
ORDERED that if Plaintiff wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court, in writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court, Clarkson S. Fisher U.S. Courthouse and Federal Bldg., 402 East State Street, Trenton, New Jersey 08608, within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order; Plaintiff's writing shall include either (1) a complete, signed in forma pauperis application, including a certified six-month prison account statement, or (2) the $350.00 filing fee; and it is further
ORDERED that upon receipt of a writing from Plaintiff stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and either a complete in forma pauperis application or filing fee within the time allotted by this Court, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this case; and it is further
ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not wish to proceed with this action with a $350.00 filing fee, he must indicate his intent to withdraw the Complaint by filing with the Court, within 30 days following entry of this Order, a letter stating his intent to withdraw the Complaint; and it is further
ORDERED that failure to so file such a letter of withdrawal may result, if Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, in an Order assessing the full $350.00 filing fee, to be paid by monthly withdrawals from Plaintiff's institutional account, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, regardless of the outcome of the litigation; and it is finally
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail.
Freda L. Wolfson