Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Valle v. Attorney General

June 22, 2012

VALLE
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL ALVAREZ
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL CUELLAR-DEMARROQUIN
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL REYES-TIRADO
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL CORDOVA
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL FERREIRA
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thomas I. Vanaskie Circuit Judge

ORDER AND PUBLIC REPRIMAND

It appearing that Arturo Suarez-Silverio, Esq. has represented litigants in thirty immigration cases before this Court since 2002; and It further appearing that, of the thirty cases, twelve have been procedurally terminated for failure to file case opening forms, pay fees or file a brief and appendix; and It further appearing that two additional cases were dismissed for failure to file case opening forms and failure to file a brief and appendix, and that those cases were reopened upon Counsel's compliance with the deficiencies; and

It further appearing that six additional cases are presently on the verge of procedural dismissal; and

It further appearing that, therefore, twenty of the thirty cases filed by Arturo

Suarez-Silverio, Esq. have faced procedural termination due to his failure to meet filing deadlines; and

It further appearing that Arturo Suarez-Silverio, Esq. did not seek to be relieved of his representation of his clients in any of the matters that were procedurally dismissed so that the Court could require that Mr. Suarez-Silverio provide his client's address prior to withdrawal, enabling the Court to advise the client that he or she could either retain new counsel or proceed pro; and

It further appearing that Arturo Suarez-Silverio, Esq. was publically admonished on November 10, 2009 by the Disciplinary Review Board of the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the admonishment noted that eight months after being retained, Mr. SuarezSilverio informed his client that he was not qualified to represent him in an asylum matter and reimbursed the retainer; and

It further appearing that, on May 3, 2012, Arturo Suarez-Silverio, Esq. was

ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his conduct should not be referred to the Court's Standing Committee on Attorney Discipline for consideration of disciplinary sanctions, including disbarrment, suspension, monetary sanctions, reprimand, or any other sanction deemed appropriate; and

It further appearing that Arturo Suarez-Silverio, Esq. was also ordered to file a written response to this Order to Show Cause on or before June 11, 2012; and

It further appearing that Arturo Suarez-Silverio, Esq. was ordered to appear before Circuit Judge Thomas I. Vanaskie on June 21, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. to explain his conduct in these matters and for the Court's consideration of the possible referral of Counsel to this Court's Disciplinary Committee; and

It further appearing that Arturo Suarez-Silverio, Esq. did not file a response to the Court's May 3, 2012 Order To Show Cause until minutes before the hearing on June 21, 2012; and

It further appearing that Arturo Suarez-Silverio, Esq. appeared at the hearing to offer an explanation for his conduct in these matters. Based on Arturo Suarez-Silverio Esq.'s representations in open Court and based on his untimely response to the Order to Show Cause, it is hereby

ORDERED that Arturo Suarez-Silverio, Esq. pay a monetary sanction of $2500.00, by close of business on Monday, June 25, 2012, for his dilatory conduct in the cases listed in the Order to Show Cause, Nos. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.