Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Nabil Hamade v. Rima Hamade

June 21, 2012

NABIL HAMADE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
RIMA HAMADE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Sussex County, Docket No. FM-19-469-11.

Per curiam.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Argued May 23, 2012

Before Judges Fuentes, Graves, and Koblitz.

Plaintiff Nabil Hamade appeals from a May 27, 2011 order denying without prejudice his motion to terminate or reduce his alimony and child support obligations. He also appeals from a July 22, 2011 order denying his motion for reconsideration. We affirm.

The parties were married in 1984, and three children were born of the marriage. Plaintiff filed for divorce in 2003. Following a twenty-four day trial in Warren County, the parties were divorced on December 14, 2006.*fn1

An amended judgment of divorce (AJOD) was entered on June 12, 2007. The AJOD required plaintiff to pay child support in the amount of $290 per week from March 6, 2009, until the marital home was sold, alimony in the amount of $1231 pending the sale of the marital home, and $500 per month towards the mortgage on the property. The marital residence was to be listed for sale in June 2007, and the net proceeds were to be divided equally between the parties. Upon the sale of the residence, plaintiff is to pay child support in the amount of $281 per week and alimony in the amount of $1110 per week. According to the AJOD, plaintiff's support arrears "were in excess of $28,000" as of December 14, 2006.

On October 2, 2008, the court heard argument on defendant's application to enforce the AJOD and for other relief. Plaintiff "appeared by telephone" because he was residing in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates. Following a "limited plenary hearing," the court entered an order on October 17, 2008, affirming plaintiff's obligations under the AJOD. The order also adjourned plaintiff's motion for a reduction in support until November 13, 2008, and plaintiff was directed "to file and serve an updated Case Information Statement in advance of the November 13, 2008 date."

On November 13, 2008, defendant was present in court with counsel, but the motion judge was unable to reach plaintiff by telephone at the number he provided. Plaintiff also failed to file a case information statement. Consequently, in an order dated January 5, 2009, the court denied plaintiff's application to reduce his support obligations and awarded counsel fees to defendant in the amount of $7960. In a statement of reasons attached to the order, the motion judge stated:

The [c]court finds the plaintiff to have acted in clear bad faith first by absconding to Dubai, and second by repeatedly failing to make himself available at his self-reported phone number in Dubai for court dates, and for contact between himself and defendant's counsel. Plaintiff has essentially made it impossible for the [c]court or defense counsel to contact him in any way. Plaintiff indicated in his last contact with the [c]court that he was starting a business in Dubai. Whatever assets he is using to start this business are hidden from the [c]court, and the [c]court believes the plaintiff to be intentionally thwarting the defendant's attempts to obtain the monies due to her from the parties' divorce.

In a subsequent order dated January 7, 2010, the court found plaintiff in violation of litigant's rights for failing to comply with his support obligations and entered judgment in favor of defendant in the amount of $133,700 for unpaid alimony and child support. The court also stated it could not confirm plaintiff's claim he was "struggling financially" because he failed to file a case information statement.

After venue was transferred from Warren County to Sussex County, plaintiff filed a post-judgment motion seeking, among other things, to discharge his "spousal and child support obligation[s] as well as the arrears." In a supporting certification dated March 17, 2011, plaintiff stated he was assigned to a management position in Dubai by Mars, Inc., in 2006. After his assignment ended in March 2008, he was offered a position in the United States at a lower salary. According to plaintiff, he met with defendant in May 2008 (at the Jefferson Diner) to discuss his plans to start his own business in Dubai, and defendant agreed to support his efforts. Accordingly, plaintiff accepted a retirement package and started "an energy management business" in Dubai. However, defendant certified that his business has not been successful because "[m]ore than half of all construction projects in Dubai have either been put on hold or cancelled" due to a weak economy.

In his March 17, 2011 certification, plaintiff said he had a monthly budget of "approximately $1,200," he lived "with [his] wife in her home," and he was "paying only for bare essentials." Plaintiff asserted that his "only current source of income" was his "Mars retirement of $4,412.21 per month," however, the "entire amount" was "diverted to defendant." Plaintiff stated that in "good faith" he "made great efforts to find employment," and "[s]ince 2008," he "applied to dozens of jobs," "reached out to every contact [he knew] in the Middle East," and posted his resume on job and social media sites. Plaintiff asserted that, while job searching, he "continue[d] to market and grow [his] own business, hoping that one day it will be successful." Plaintiff stated that he had "no way to earn the income [he] was [earning] in 2008 with Mars[,] which was $182,000."

Defendant opposed plaintiff's motion to modify the AJOD, and the matter was heard on May 27, 2011. Following oral argument, the court denied plaintiff's motion without prejudice because it was "procedurally defective." The court found plaintiff: (1) failed to provide "sufficient information" regarding the status of the former marital residence; (2) failed to submit his prior case information statements; (3) failed to include his year-to-date income ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.