Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State of New Jersey v. Paula K. Mastro

February 6, 2012

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PAULA K. MASTRO, A/K/A PAULA KASMAN, PAULA ANN MASTRO, MASTRO KASMAN, PAULA KASMAN MASTRO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Somerset County, Indictment No. 06-12-1003.

Per curiam.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Submitted February 9, 2011

Before Judges R. B. Coleman and Lihotz.

We review this matter on remand from the Supreme Court. Defendant Paula K. Mastro appeals from the maximum five-year sentence imposed by the trial court for violation of the terms of her previously imposed probationary sentence (VOP), N.J.S.A. 2C:45-3a(4), and a consecutive sentence entered on the separately charged offense of joyriding, N.J.S.A. 2C:20-10d, to which defendant pled guilty. The plea agreement for the latter offense provided for a term of 180 days in the county jail, which would be suspended if defendant enrolled in and completed a substance abuse treatment program. At sentencing, when defendant had not completed the treatment program, the trial judge "abated the plea understanding" and sentenced defendant to 180 days in the county jail for joyriding and five years in prison for the VOP. The court ordered the sentences to run consecutively.

Since filing her appeal, defendant has completed the imposed sentence and has been released. These circumstances render her appeal moot. Accordingly, we dismiss.

On January 20, 2005, defendant pled guilty to the third-degree offenses of burglary, N.J.S.A. 2C:18-2; theft by deception, N.J.S.A. 2C:20-4; fraudulent use of a credit card, N.J.S.A. 2C:21-6h; and identity theft, N.J.S.A. 2C:21-17a. The remaining charges in the indictment were dismissed by the State. In exchange for her guilty plea, the State recommended a three-year probationary sentence, with the special condition that she serve thirty days in the county jail, which was suspended.

Defendant was also to obtain a drug evaluation and comply with recommended treatment and pay restitution and other penalties and assessments. Defendant was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement.

While still on probation, defendant was arrested when riding in a stolen vehicle driven by her daughter. Defendant was charged with violating probation because of the new offense and because she tested positive for cocaine and heroin on three occasions.

Defendant pled guilty to joyriding and VOP in exchange for the State's recommendation of 180 days in the county jail, which would be suspended upon her successful completion of six months in a drug rehabilitation program. Defendant entered the substance abuse treatment program, but was discharged for failing to comply with the rules. Thereafter, the State consented to delay sentencing on the probation violation subject to defendant's enrollment in a long-term inpatient substance abuse treatment program.

Defendant failed to enroll as required. Therefore, the sentencing judge imposed a 180-day county jail term for joyriding and a consecutive five-year term for the VOP, ordering the two sentences to be served consecutively.

On February 2, 2009, we considered defendant's challenges on an excessive sentencing oral argument calendar. We affirmed the sentence imposed. Defendant's petition for certification was granted by the Supreme Court, which summarily reversed and remanded the matter requesting we "address whether the parties entered into a valid plea agreement and, if so, whether the sentence imposed was in accord with that agreement and controlling case law."

Defendant presents these issues for ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.