October 18, 2011
SPILLERMAN HILL, APPELLANT,
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT.
On appeal from the New Jersey Department of Corrections.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
Submitted May 24, 2011
Decided Resubmitted September 1, 2011 -
Decided June 17, 2011
Before Judges Payne and Koblitz.
Defendant, Spillerman Hill, appealed from a final agency decision of the Department of Corrections regarding the calculation of sentences imposed upon him as a juvenile and an adult. Because our review of the papers submitted by the Department of Corrections in opposition to defendant's appeal led us to the conclusion that we lacked a sufficiently clear explanation of the way that defendant's sentences were calculated to permit us to verify the validity of either party's arguments, we remanded the matter to the Department for a detailed explanation of each sentence. Jurisdiction was retained.
We have recently received the requested explanation, which contains the statement that defendant was paroled on March 31, 2011 on both the juvenile and state prison terms. Having verified that fact, we dismiss defendant's appeal as moot. Dismissed.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.