Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State of New Jersey v. David C. Orden

September 8, 2011

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
DAVID C. ORDEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Morris County, Municipal Appeal No. 09-002.

Per curiam.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Submitted May 18, 2011

Before Judges Fuentes and Kestin.

Defendant, David C. Orden, appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the Law Division after a trial de novo on the record, Rule 3:23-8, finding him guilty of careless driving, N.J.S.A. 39:4-97. The court stated its reasons for the decision orally on the record, and ordered a fine of $81 and assessed $33 in court costs, both of which, the court noted in the judgment, had been "previously paid." The judgment also vacated "[a]ny other fines and/or penalties inconsistent with this order."

On appeal, defendant, pro se, advances the following arguments for our consideration:

Point 1

MY RIGHTS HAVE BEEN DENIED AND VIOLATED REPEATEDLY THROUGHOUT THE PROCEEDINGS.

Point 2

INEFFECTIVE DEFENSE ATTORNEY[.]

Point 3

THE OFFICER'S CREDIBILITY WAS NOT SUFFICIENT TO BASE A CONVICTION ON.

Point 4

THE PROSECUTION HAS FAILED TO PROVE THE ELEMENTS OF THE CASE WHICH THEY CLAIM ARE THE BASIS OF THE SUMMONS, NAMELY IMPROPER ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.