Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State of New Jersey v. Terrel Bridges

July 28, 2011

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TERREL BRIDGES, A/K/A TYREE KELLY, TERRELL LO, AZIZ A. WILLIAMS, TERRELL B. WILLIAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment No. 07-10-3670.

Per curiam.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Submitted April 13, 2011

Before Judges Sapp-Peterson and Simonelli.

Following a jury trial, defendant Terrel Bridges was convicted of third-degree possession of a controlled dangerous substance (CDS), N.J.S.A. 2C:35-10a(1); third-degree possession of CDS with intent to distribute, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5a(1); third-degree possession of CDS with intent to distribute within 1000 feet of a school, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-7; and fourth-degree hindering apprehension, N.J.S.A. 2C:29-3b(4). The trial judge sentenced defendant to an aggregate ten-year term of imprisonment with five years of parole ineligibility, and imposed the appropriate assessments, penalties, and fees.

On appeal, defendant raises the following contentions:

POINT ONE

THE TRIAL COURT'S REFUSAL TO CONDUCT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS DEPRIVED DEFENDANT OF HIS DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO A FULL AND FAIR DETERMINATION OF HIS MOTION

POINT II

EXPERT TESTIMONY THAT DEFENDANT HAD ENGAGED IN "AN ILLEGAL HAND-TO-HAND TRANSACTION FOR NARCOTICS" AND THAT THIS CONCLUSION

WAS BASED ON "REVIEWING ALL THE EVIDENCE IN THIS INVESTIGATION" IMPERMISSIBLY INVADED THE PROVINCE OF THE JURY

POINT III

THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN SENTENCING DEFENDANT TO THE MAXIMUM TEN-YEAR TERM WITH FIVE YEARS OF PAROLE INELIGIBILITY BECAUSE A QUALITATIVE WEIGHING OF THE AGGRAVATING AND MITIGATING FACTORS DOES NOT SUPPORT SUCH A SENTENCE We hold that defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his motion to suppress because of a material factual dispute as to how the police recovered the narcotics found in defendant's car. We also hold that defendant is entitled to a new trial because the State's expert's testimony improperly invaded the province of the jury to decide the ultimate question of defendant's guilt. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on defendant's motion to suppress and a new trial.

I.We derive the following facts from the evidence presented at trial. At approximately 1:30 p.m. on July 31, 2007, Detectives Reginald Holloway, Darryl Robinson, and Tracey Bennett of the Essex County Sheriff's Department Bureau of Narcotics were conducting surveillance from a van in the area of Renner Avenue and Goodwin Avenue in ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.