Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Theodore Connolly v. County of Hudson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY


June 21, 2011

THEODORE CONNOLLY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COUNTY OF HUDSON, ROBERT B. KNAPP, INDIVIDUALLY, AND JUAN M. PEREZ, INDIVIDUALLY, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Chesler, District Judge

CLOSED

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon motion for summary judgment by Defendant Juan M. Perez ("Perez") [docket entry 18] and cross-motions for summary judgment by Defendants Robert B. Knapp ("Knapp") [docket entry 19] and County of Hudson ("Hudson County") (collectively, "Defendants") [docket entry 23]; and Plaintiff Theodore Connolly ("Plaintiff") having opposed the motions; and the Court having considered the papers submitted by the parties; and the Court having decided to rule on the motion based on those submissions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78; and for the reasons expressed in the Opinion filed herewith;

IT IS on this 20th day of June, 2011,

ORDERED that the Defendants' motions for summary judgment be and hereby are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and it is further

ORDERED that summary judgment on Plaintiff's claims pursuant to the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601, be and hereby is GRANTED in favor of Hudson County; and it is further

ORDERED that summary judgment on Plaintiff's claims pursuant to § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794(a), be and hereby is GRANTED in favor of Hudson County; and it is further

ORDERED that summary judgment on Plaintiff's claims pursuant to the Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. § 1501, be and hereby is GRANTED in favor of Defendants; and it is further

ORDERED that summary judgment on Plaintiff's claims under N.J.A.C. § 4A:10-1.2, N.J.S.A. § 11A:2-23, N.J.A.C. § 4A:2-5.1, N.J.S.A. § 34:19-9, and N.J.S.A. § 10:5 against Defendants be and hereby is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that summary judgment on Plaintiff's claims of defamation and invasion of privacy against Defendant Knapp be and hereby is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims under N.J.A.C. § 4A:10-1.2, N.J.S.A. § 11A:2-23, N.J.A.C. § 4A:2-5.1, N.J.S.A. § 34:19-9, and N.J.S.A. § 10:5 against Defendants be and hereby are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3); and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims of defamation and invasion of privacy against Defendant Knapp be and hereby are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3).

STANLEY R. CHESLER United States District Judge

20110621

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.