UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
January 31, 2011
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF, PETITIONERS,
GMAC CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C., RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hillman, District Judge
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
This matter having come before the Court on the motion of Petitioners, New Jersey Building Laborers Statewide Benefit Funds and the Trustees Thereof, seeking to confirm the arbitration award granted against Respondent, GMAC Construction, L.L.C.; and
Petitioners constituting trust funds within the meaning of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 186(c)(5), and employee benefit plans within the meaning of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e) and (f); and Petitioners also including trustees of the funds within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A); and
It appearing that the parties entered into an enforceable collective bargaining agreement ("CBA") and that, pursuant to the CBA's terms and provisions, Respondent was obligated to make contributions to the funds and also acknowledged the Petitioners' rights and duties as set forth in the Declaration of Trust of the Funds ("Trust Agreement"); and
The Trust Agreement providing: "The Trustees may take any action necessary or appropriate to enforce payment of the contributions, interest, damages, and expenses provided for herein"; and
The Trust Agreement further providing that Petitioners may "designate a permanent arbitrator to hear and determine collection disputes" if Respondent fails to make contributions as required; and
It appearing that on November 2, 2010, an arbitrator found that Respondent was obligated to contribute benefit contributions to the Petitioners and awarded Petitioners $10,067.11 in unpaid contributions, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and the arbitrator's fee; and
It further appearing that Respondent has not complied with the arbitrator's decision and has not made any payments to Petitioners; and
It further appearing that Petitioners properly served the present petition and motion upon Respondent, and that Respondent still has not appeared in this action; and
Section 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act empowering the Court to enter judgment on an arbitration award, 9 U.S.C. § 9; and
The Court noting that "[d]istrict courts have very little authority to upset arbitrators' awards," United Transp. Union Local 1589 v. Suburban Transit Corp., 51 F.3d 376, 379 (3d Cir. 1995); see Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Int'l Union Local 5 v. Jocanz, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46461, at *4 (D.N.J. Jun. 25, 2007) (same); and
The Court further noting that "[o]nly when an arbitrator acted in manifest disregard of the law, or if the record before the arbitrator reveals no support whatsoever for the arbitrator's determination, may a district court invade the province of the arbitrator," United Transp. Union Local 1589, 514 F.3d at 380 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see 9 U.S.C. § 10 (enumerating the circumstances in which an arbitrator's award may be vacated); and
The Court finding that Respondent has not submitted any response or opposition to Petitioners' petition or motion; and
The Court finding that no evidence or argument suggests, nor does the Court discern, that the arbitrator acted in manifest disregard of the law, in excess of his authority, or in any biased or corrupt manner when he issued the Award and Order on November 2, 2010; and
The Court finding that the arbitrator's Award and Order, and the decision therein, appear reasonable;
IT IS HEREBY on this 31st day of January, 2011, ORDERED that Petitioners' Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award [Doc. # 2] is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that the arbitration award issued by J.J. Pierson, Esq., on November 2, 2010, shall be and is hereby CONFIRMED; and it is further
ORDERED that a judgment for $10,067.11, as directed by the arbitrator, shall be entered against Respondent; and it is further
ORDERED that this case shall be CLOSED.
At Camden, New Jersey NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.