Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Owens

November 17, 2010

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
RICHARD D. OWENS, A/K/A/ RICK OWENS, A/K/A RICKY OWENS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County, Indictment No. 01-09-01635.

Per curiam.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Submitted October 26, 2010

Before Judges Yannotti and Espinosa.

Defendant Richard D. Owens appeals from an order entered by the Law Division on March 28, 2008, which denied his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). We affirm.

Defendant was charged under Indictment No. 01-09-1635 with first degree murder, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3 (count one); and third degree possession of a weapon for an unlawful purpose, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:39-4(d) (count two). On August 2, 2002, defendant pled guilty to count one, which was amended to charge defendant with first degree aggravated manslaughter, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:11-4(a)(1). Defendant also pled guilty to count two. The State agreed to recommend a twenty-five year sentence, with a period of parole ineligibility as prescribed by the No Early Release Act (NERA), N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7.2.

At the plea hearing, defendant stated that on June 19, 2001, he was living in the home of Naomi Walker (Naomi) in Asbury Park. Naomi is the mother of Robin Walker (Robin), who had been at one time defendant's girlfriend. Defendant and Robin lived together at various times over the years. Robin had been incarcerated and defendant continued to "support" her in some fashion while she was in jail. Defendant said that he wanted to continue his relationship with her.

A day or two before June 19th, Robin came home from an inpatient drug treatment program on a weekend pass. According to defendant, Robin did not want to continue their relationship. On June 19th, defendant woke up at around 4:30 or 5:00 a.m. to get ready for work. Robin was sleeping in a room with her mother, and defendant tried to wake Robin up. She became upset and started screaming.

Robin accused defendant of trying to hurt her. Naomi awakened, told defendant to leave the room, and went to the bathroom. Defendant and Robin continued to argue. Defendant began to strike Robin with his fists. Naomi returned from the bathroom and left the apartment. After Naomi departed, defendant took a knife from the kitchen and struck Robin with it.

It appears from the record that defendant stabbed Robin twenty times. Defendant stated that, when he stabbed Robin, he did not care whether the blows would cause her death. He acknowledged that that his actions showed extreme indifference to human life. Defendant said that he understood that his actions caused Robin's death.

Defendant was sentenced on October 11, 2002. The trial court merged count two with count one, and sentenced defendant on count one to twenty-five years of incarceration, with a period of parole ineligibility as prescribed by NERA. The court also imposed appropriate monetary penalties.

Defendant filed a notice of appeal and challenged his sentence. The appeal was heard on the court's excessive sentence calendar. Defendant's sentence was affirmed. State v. Owens, No. A-4044-02 (July 10, 2003). Defendant thereafter sought review of our judgment by filing a petition for certification with the Supreme Court. The Court denied the petition. State v. Owens, 178 N.J. 374 (2003).

On July 30, 2007, defendant filed a PCR petition in the Law Division, and PCR counsel was assigned to represent defendant. Defendant alleged that he had been denied the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing. He claimed that his trial attorney was ineffective because he failed to argue for a sentence of shorter duration than the maximum permitted by the plea agreement.

The PCR court found that defendant was procedurally barred from pursuing these claims because his sentence had been affirmed on appeal. The court found, however, that even if the claims were not barred, they were without merit. The court pointed out that defendant pled guilty to aggravated manslaughter, knowing that he was avoiding "what was probably a certain murder conviction[.]" The court stated that, when ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.