Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pitts v. Hayman

October 7, 2010

DARYLE L. PITTS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Douglas E. Arpert United States Magistrate Judge

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

This matter having come before the Court by way of informal application by Joseph Micheletti, Deputy Attorney General, on behalf of Defendants George W. Haymn, Michelle R. Ricci, Donald Mee, Jr., and Christopher Holmes (collectively "Defendants") for a scheduling order setting forth the time within which to complete discovery, submit dispositive motion(s) and file pretrial submissions and for leave to depose Plaintiff [dkt. entry no. 39]; and the Court having reviewed the parties' written submissions; and the Court having considered the matter pursuant to F ED. R. C IV. P. 78; and good cause having been shown; and for the reasons stated above;

IT IS on this 7 th day of October, 2010,

ORDERED that:

1) The pending Notice of Call for Dismissal pursuant to Local Civil Rule 41.1 is [dkt. entry no. 31] is terminated.

2) All discovery is to be completed by January 14, 2011. Outstanding discovery disputes must be resolved by appropriate motion returnable before that date. See Local Civil Rules 7.1, 37.1, 56.1, 78.1 (motions) and 26.1 (discovery).

3) Prior to the deadline for completion of discovery, Defendants may take the deposition of Plaintiff who is presently incarcerated in New Jersey State Prison in Trenton, New Jersey. The deposition is to be taken on a date and time designated by the Office of the Attorney General upon three (3) days notice to the Administrator of the prison where Plaintiff is assigned and at a place designated by said Administrator; and that the court reporter shall bring with him/her all necessary equipment including, but not limited to, a laptop computer, into the facility.

4) Any dispositive motion(s) shall be filed no later than February 11, 2011 and made returnable on March 7, 2011. Any opposition briefing must be submitted no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the return date. Any reply briefing shall be submitted no later than seven (7) days prior to the return date. Copies of all motion papers shall be served on the Clerk of the Court and opposing counsel/ pro se litigant.

5) In the event no dispositive motion(s) has been filed, the parties are to comply with the previously provided directive regarding the contents of the Pretrial Memorandum. One (1) original and one (1) copy of the Plaintiff's Pretrial Memorandum shall be submitted to the Honorable Douglas E. Arpert, U.S.M.J. and to Defendants' counsel by March 1, 2011. Defendants' counsel shall incorporate Plaintiff's Pretrial Memorandum into Defendants' Pretrial Memorandum, and same shall be submitted to the Honorable Douglas E. Arpert, U.S.M.J. by March 15, 2011. Copies of all Pretrial Memoranda shall be served on opposing counsel/pro se litigant. The Pretrial Memoranda are not to be filed on CM/ECF by the parties.

6) The Pretrial Order in this matter shall be filed by the Court on or about March 31, 2011. There shall be no appearances by any party or counsel unless directed by the Court.

7) There will be no further extension(s) of the deadlines established herein except upon formal motion and on a showing of good cause.

Pretrial Memorandum Instructions

Each party shall prepare a Pretrial Memorandum which shall contain the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.