Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Matos v. City of Camden

November 13, 2009

ENRIQUE MATOS AND LINDA MATOS, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF CAMDEN, DETECTIVE MARSHALL MORGAN, AND OFFICER LUIS SANCHEZ, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hillman, District Judge

ORDER

THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon the motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant City of Camden; and

The Court having conducted oral argument on the motion on November 12, 2009, during which it noted the appearances of Thomas Bruno, II, Esquire on behalf of Plaintiff Enrique Matos, John C. Eastlack, Jr., Esquire on behalf of Defendant Luis Sanchez, Ralph Kramer, Esquire on behalf of Defendant Marshall Morgan, and Frank A. Salvati, Esquire on behalf of Cross-Defendant City of Camden; and

For the reasons set forth on the record during oral argument, with the Court reserving the right to supplement its oral opinions with a written opinion at a later time pursuant to L. Civ. R. 52.1, and for good cause shown;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 13th day of November, 2009, that Defendant City of Camden's Motion for Reconsideration [72] is DENIED.

HON. NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.

20091113

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.