The opinion of the court was delivered by: Robert B. Kugler United States District Judge
Plaintiff, Luis Ziempoaltectl, a state inmate presently confined at the Camden County Correctional Facility in Camden, New Jersey, at the time he submitted this Complaint for filing, seeks to bring this civil action for money damages and injunctive relief under various federal laws and statutes, including 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for alleged violations of his constitutional rights. Plaintiff failed to pay the $350.00 filing fee and did not submit a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (April 26, 1996) (the "Act"), which amends 28 U.S.C. § 1915, establishes certain financial requirements for prisoners who are attempting to bring a civil action or file an appeal in forma pauperis.
Under the Act, a prisoner bringing a civil action in forma pauperis must submit an affidavit, including a statement of all assets, which states that the prisoner is unable to pay the fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The prisoner also must submit a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The prisoner must obtain this statement from the appropriate official of each prison or institutional facility at which he was or is confined. Id.
Even if the prisoner is granted in forma pauperis status, the prisoner must pay the full amount of the $350 filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). In each month that the amount in the prisoner's account exceeds $10.00, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid, the agency having custody of the prisoner shall assess, deduct from the prisoner's account, and forward to the Clerk of the Court payment equal to 20% of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
Plaintiff may not have known when he submitted his complaint that he must pay the filing fee, and that even if the full filing fee, or any part of it, has been paid, the Court must dismiss the case if it finds that the action is: (1) frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). If the Court dismisses the case for any of these reasons, the Act does not permit the prisoner to get his filing fee back.
If the prisoner has, on three or more prior occasions while incarcerated, brought an action or appeal in a court that was dismissed on any of the grounds listed above, he cannot bring another action in forma pauperis unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
In this case, Plaintiff failed to either pay the $350.00 filing fee, or submit a complete in forma pauperis application as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1); in particular, Plaintiff failed to provide a complete in forma pauperis application that contains a signed certification from an authorized officer of the Camden County Correctional Facility, where plaintiff presently is confined, and his six-month institutional account statement, as prescribed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).
However, in his application to proceed as an indigent, Plaintiff contends that he is an immigration detainee, and therefore, he is not subject to the requirements under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). In contradiction of this assertion, Plaintiff states in his Complaint that he was arrested on a New Jersey state warrant and committed to the Camden County Correctional Facility in April 2008. He was then indicted by a New Jersey state grand jury in January 23, 2009, and would appear to be a state pre-trial detainee. (Complaint at ¶¶ 13, 14).
Plaintiff next states in his Complaint that he pled guilty to a lesser charge and was thus convicted in a New Jersey state court on or about May 6, 2009. (Complaint at ¶ 16).
Accordingly, it appears to this Court that Plaintiff's detention at the Camden County Correctional Facility is pursuant to either a state court conviction, or as a pretrial detainee, and not as an immigration detainee. Either status as a convicted prisoner or a pretrial detainee would require Plaintiff to submit a complete in forma pauperis application that satisfies the strictures of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). On June 3, 2009, this Court issued a Memorandum and Order directing Plaintiff to show cause in writing why his application for indigent status should not be denied and his action be administratively terminated. Specifically, the Court instructed Plaintiff to show that he is not a "prisoner" as that term is defined under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h). The Order directed that Plaintiff respond on or before June 29, 2009.
To date, Plaintiff has failed to respond to this Court's June 3, 2009 Order.
THEREFORE, it is on this 3rd day of August , 2009;
ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED, without ...