The opinion of the court was delivered by: Noel L. Hillman United States District Judge At Camden, New Jersey
The Court having considered Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and file the complaint without prepayment of fees, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915; and the Court having screened the complaint and amended complaint to determine whether dismissal is warranted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A;
It is on this 29th day of July , 2009, ORDERED that Plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of the $350.00 filing fee, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and (b); and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to file the complaint in the above-captioned action; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order by regular mail on the Attorney General for the State of New Jersey and on the warden of the Atlantic County Justice Facility; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff is assessed a filing fee of $350.00 and shall pay the entire filing fee in the manner set forth in this order, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2), regardless of the outcome of the litigation; and it is further
ORDERED that in each month that the amount in Plaintiff's account exceeds $10.00, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid, the agency having custody of the Plaintiff shall assess, deduct from Plaintiff's account, and forward to the Clerk of the Court payment equal to 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), and each payment shall reference the civil docket number of this action; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case; and it is finally
ORDERED that, within 45 days from the date this Order is entered, Plaintiff may move to reopen his case, attaching to any such motion a proposed amended complaint which addresses the deficiencies of the complaint as stated in the Opinion accompanying this Order.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...