Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Velez v. Pittman

June 3, 2009

TATIANA VELEZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BEVERLY PITTMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joel A. Pisano United States District Judge

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's filing of amended complaint, Docket Entry No. 6, and Plaintiff's submission of her duly executed application to proceed in this matter in forma pauperis. See Docket Entry No. 7.

IT IS on this 3rd day of June, 2009,

ORDERED that the Clerk shall reopen this matter for the purposes of the Court's examination of Plaintiff's amended complaint and her application to proceed in this matter in forma pauperis; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall make a new and separate entry on the docket reading "CIVIL CASE REOPENED"; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in this matter in forma pauperis is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall file Plaintiff's amended complaint, Docket Entry No. 6; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's amended complaint may proceed past the sua sponte dismissal stage; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall issue summons, and the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the amended complaint, summons, and this Order upon Defendants identified by Plaintiff in her amended complaint, Docket Entry No. 6,*fn1 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); and it is further

ORDERED that served Defendants shall file and serve a responsive pleading within the time specified in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2); and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) and § 4(a) of Appendix H of the Local Civil Rules, the Clerk shall notify Plaintiff of the opportunity to apply in writing to the assigned judge for the appointment of pro bono counsel in accordance with the factors set forth in Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147 (3d Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1196 (1994), which sets forth the requirements for eligibility for appointment of pro bono counsel. Plaintiff is expressly advised that such appointment is neither guaranteed nor automatic; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall enclose with such notice a copy of Appendix H and a form Application for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel; and it is further

ORDERED that, if at any time the Plaintiff seeks the appointment of pro bono counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a) and (d), plaintiff shall (1) serve a copy of the Application for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel by regular mail upon each party at his last known address, or, if the party is represented in this action by an attorney, upon the party's attorney at the attorney's address, and (2) file a Certificate of Service with the Application for Pro Bono Counsel; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(b), the Clerk of the Court shall forward a copy of this order by regular mail to the Attorney Generals of the State of New Jersey and the warden of the place ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.