Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Carroll

May 29, 2009

IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS J. CARROLL.


On appeal from the Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement System, Department of Treasury.

Per curiam.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Argued May 5, 2009

Before Judges Collester and Grall.

Thomas J. Carroll appeals from a final administrative determination of the Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement System. Substantially for the reasons stated by the Board in its written determination dated February 22, 2008, we affirm.

Carroll is as an Assistant Prosecutor in the office of the Hudson County Prosecutor. He was first hired in November 1985 and enrolled in the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) effective April 1, 1986. In October 1989, however, he resigned and withdrew his pension contributions. Approximately two years later, Carroll was rehired and returned to work as an Assistant Prosecutor in Hudson County. On January 1, 1992, he was again enrolled in PERS.

Effective January 7, 2002, Chapter 366 of the Laws of 2001, N.J.S.A. 43:15A-155 to -161, established a "Prosecutors Part" within PERS. Retirement benefits available to eligible members of the Prosecutors Part are more generous than benefits available to other members of PERS.

Carroll, who was still serving as an Assistant Prosecutor in Hudson County on the effective date, qualified for membership in the Prosecutors Part. In December 2002, Carroll applied to purchase service credit for the forty-eight months he had worked in the 1980s. The Division of Pensions gave Carroll a price, which he paid in April 2003. The Division acknowledged receipt of his payment and informed him that the service credits would be added to his PERS account, not his Prosecutors Part account. In response to Carroll's objection, the Division denied relief on the ground that "the law does not allow the purchase of prior service credit to be credited to the Prosecutors Part" of PERS. In October 2007, Carroll filed an administrative appeal with the Board seeking reversal of the Division's action or, in the alternative, refund of his payment. The Board denied both requests.

Carroll presents two issues on appeal:

I. N.J.A.C. 17:2-8.6 IS FACIALLY INVALID BECAUSE IT IS INCONSISTENT WITH N.J.S.A. 43:15A-156, THEREBY RENDERING THE BOARD'S FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION AS ARBITRARY, UNREASONABLE AND ILLEGAL.

II. EVEN IF THIS COURT WERE TO REJECT THE FACIAL CHALLENGE TO N.J.A.C. 17:2-8.6, CARROLL MUST PREVAIL ON AN "AS APPLIED" CHALLENGE.

In pertinent part, N.J.S.A. 43:15A-156 provides:

a. . . . Any service credit which has been established in the Public Employees' Retirement System by a prosecutor prior to the effective date of this act shall be established in the Prosecutors Part without further assessment of cost to the prosecutor; provided, however, any service credit which has been established in the Public Employees' Retirement System by a member of the retirement system in any position prior to service as a county prosecutor, nominated and appointed pursuant to Article VII, Section II, paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution, shall be established in the Prosecutors Part without further assessment of cost to the prosecutor.

b. All outstanding obligations, such as loans, purchases and other arrearage, shall be satisfied by a prosecutor as previously scheduled for payment to ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.