IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE
May 20, 2009
HERBERT COUNCIL, PLAINTIFF,
JOHN NASH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Robert B. Kugler United States District Judge
(Docket Entry Nos. 156, 157)
THIS MATTERhaving come before the Court on motions by Plaintiff Herbert Council ("Plaintiff") seeking a continuance of the trial date (Docket Entry No. 156) and seeking a legal furlough (Docket Entry No. 157); and
IT APPEARING TO THE COURT that Plaintiff seeks a continuance of the trial date until after September 9, 2009; and
IT FURTHER APPEARING TO THE COURT that the trial date has already been adjourned until September 21, 2009; and
IT FURTHER APPEARING TO THE COURT that Plaintiff seeks a legal furlough to attend the trial; and
THE COURT NOTING that if Plaintiff is still incarcerated at the time of the trial, his presence may be secured with a writ of habeas corpus, see 28 U.S.C. § 2241; and
THE COURT FINDING that a legal furlough is therefore unnecessary;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for a continuance of the trial date is DISMISSED as moot; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for a legal furlough is DENIED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.