Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ali v. Ali

April 27, 2009

TEHMINA ALI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
SHAUKAT ALI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Sussex County, Docket No. FM-19-307-1999.

Per curiam.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Argued January 28, 2009

Before Judges A. A. Rodríguez and Payne.

This appeal concerns a post-divorce hearing conducted on July 5, 2007 in which a Family Part judge (1) struck defendant's brief as incomprehensible; (2) denied reconsideration of the judge's May 15, 2007 order requiring that defendant pay the counsel fees incurred by plaintiff in the matrimonial action and its aftermath; (3) found no misappropriation of child support funds by plaintiff's attorneys; and (4) denied counsel fees to defendant, a pro se litigant.

On appeal, defendant challenges the determination of the Family Part judge that plaintiff's attorneys had not misappropriated defendant's child support payment. In his brief on appeal, defendant presents the following questions, which we set forth verbatim:

Issue No 1

DOES PLAINTIFF LAW FIRM MISAPPROPRIATED DEFENDANT CHECK?

Issue No 2

Does it duty of the every judge to abide by and enforce the provision of the code of judicial conduct?

Issue No 3

Does justice is right of all men and private property of none?

Issue No 4

Does judge take oath to do justice not to ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.