Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ramirez v. Lycatel

October 20, 2008

ORLANDO S. RAMIREZ, PLAINTIFF
v.
LYCATEL, LLC DEFENDANT



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Patty Shwartz United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER ON INFORMAL APPLICATION & SECOND AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

THIS MATTER having come before the Court for a telephone status conference on October 20, 2008; and the defendant reporting that it will produce certain information that plaintiff needs to evaluate his settlement position; and the plaintiff requesting a stay of proceedings; and the Court determining that since it has already adjusted the deadlines to enable the parties to engage in such discussions that a stay is not warranted but that it would grant the extension to enable the parties to prioritize as they see fit work needed to further settlement and work needed for litigation; and for the reasons discussed during the telephone conference; and for good cause shown,

IT IS on this 20th day of October, 2008,

ORDERED THAT:

1. The request to stay the proceedings is denied but the request to extend the pretrial deadlines is granted as set forth herein;

2. No later than deadline passed, the parties shall submit a proposed discovery confidentiality order and certification in accordance with Local Rule 5.3.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:

I. COURT DATES

1. There shall be a telephone status conference before the Undersigned on December

2, 2008 at 11:30 a.m. Plaintiff shall initiate the telephone call.

2. There will be a settlement conference before the Undersigned on TO BE SET IF REQUESTED. Trial Counsel and clients with full settlement authority must attend the conference. If the trial counsel and client with full settlement authority do not appear, the settlement conference may be cancelled or rescheduled and the noncompliant party and/or attorney may be sanctioned, which may include an assessment of the costs and expenses incurred by those parties who appeared as directed.

3. A final pretrial conference shall be conducted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(d) on August 11, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. The Final Pretrial Conference will occur even if there are dispositive motions pending. The Court will adjourn the Final Pretrial conference only if the requesting party makes a compelling showing that manifest injustice would otherwise result absent adjournment.

II. DISCOVERY AND MOTION PRACTICE

4. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 disclosures are to be exchanged on or ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.