Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Castillo v. Brimm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY


August 6, 2008

KENIA M. CASTILLO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RAY HERBERT BRIMM, ET AL. DEFENDANTS,

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Patty Shwartz United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER ON INFORMAL APPLICATION

This matter having come before the Court by way of application under Local Civ. R. .6.1 for an extension of the deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint; and the application reflecting that it was filed after the date to respond had passed and it seeks an extension of more days than permitted by Rule 6.1; and the parties being advised that any request for an extension of the deadline shall be made via consent order or, if consent cannot be secured, by formal motion;

IT IS THEREFORE ON this 6th day of August, 2008

ORDERED that the application of defendants Brimm and Leach Trucking to extend the deadline to Answer, move or otherwise respond [Docket No. 4] is denied without prejudice to the submission of a consent order embodying the requested extension or, in the absence of consent, a formal motion for the extension.

20080806

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.