Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Williams v. Nash

August 5, 2008

ANTHONY WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHN NASH ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Robert B. Kugler United States District Judge

(Docket Entry No. 75)

ORDER

THIS MATTER HAVING COME BEFORE THE COURT on motion for reconsideration by Defendants Ms. De Cardi, Tushar Patel, Vincent Elias, Steve Esposito, Samir Sulayman, Derek Hamel, David Schaaff, and Glen Lawhorn (collectively, "Defendants") of the Court's prior Opinion on Defendants' motion for summary judgment on the complaint of Plaintiff Anthony Williams ("Plaintiff"); and the Court having considered the moving papers and the opposition thereto; and for the reasons expressed in the accompanying opinion;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion for clarification of the prior Opinion and Order is GRANTED, and the Court notes that Defendant De Cardi has not yet been served in her individual capacity, and the motion for summary judgment submitted by Defendants (Docket Entry No. 50) and addressed in the Court's prior Opinion was not submitted on her behalf.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion for reconsideration regarding Plaintiff's claims based on his failure to participate in the Financial Responsibility Program GRANTED, and Defendant Hamel is GRANTED summary judgment on this claim.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion for reconsideration regarding the prior Opinion's treatment of Plaintiff's claims of retaliation with regard to his lost time wages is DENIED. The Court continues to express no opinion on that particular claim.

20080805

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.