Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fox v. Fox

June 11, 2008

WILLIAM T. FOX, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
DOROTHY J. FOX, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County, Docket No. FM-02-2269-04.

Per curiam.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Submitted May 5, 2008

Before Judges Lintner and Graves.

The parties were married on October 28, 1983, and their judgment of divorce (JOD), which incorporates a property settlement agreement (PSA), is dated February 9, 2005. Defendant Dorothy Fox appeals from two provisions in a post-judgment order dated August 3, 2007, denying her application (1) "to require plaintiff to pay alimony in the amount of $5,000"; and (2) denying her application "to place a lien on plaintiff's residence." Defendant also appeals from a subsequent order dated September 25, 2007, denying her motion for reconsideration and awarding counsel fees to plaintiff in the amount of $1100.

On appeal, defendant makes the following arguments:

POINT I

THE TRIAL JUDGE ERRED IN DENYING ORAL ARGUMENT, NECESSITATING THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION.

POINT II

THE TRIAL JUDGE ERRED IN CITING ARTICLE VIII IN THE PSA, AND THUS NOT RECOGNIZING OR ENFORCING AN EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION/ALIMONY PAYMENT, WHICH PRODUCED AN UNJUST RESULT.

POINT III

THE TRIAL JUDGE ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT TO FILE A LIS PENDENS TO SECURE FUTURE EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION IN THE MARITAL HOME.

POINT IV

THE TRIAL JUDGE ERRED IN DENYING HER REQUEST FOR COUNSEL FEES AND ASSESSMENT OF OPPOSING COUNSEL FEES ON THE RECONSIDERATION, WITHOUT RENDERING ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.