On appeal from the New Jersey Tax Court.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
Before Judges Sabatino and Alvarez.
This pro se appeal is filed by plaintiff, Kaleel G. Gareeb, M.D., from an April 13, 2007, judgment dismissing his appeal of the 2006 tax assessment on real property he owns in Passaic. We affirm.
The judgment memorialized a March 23, 2007 written decision in which Tax Court Judge Bianco first quoted verbatim from plaintiff's brief:
In his motion the Taxpayer  seeks:
(1) Burial of Kuskin's, Bianco's and Tannenbaum escape hatch = R. 4:6-2(e)
(2) Verify the virtues of Ruling of '94
(3) Quash the spuriously tailored '97 Ruling and the un-virtuous Kuskin & Tannenbaum
(4) Validate NJSA 2A-35A-10(b) that was discarded by Kuskin, Bianco & Tannenbaum
The judge went onto explain:
[Plaintiff] also asks the court to address the five years of office vacancy at the subject property, as well as the disputed office square footage and the dwelling rent utilized by the City's Assessor. According to [plaintiff], he is "seeking justice per NJSA 2A:35A-10(b) and Rules, 4:3-4(a), 4:5-1, 4:5-7 & 4:9-1."
[Plaintiff's] convoluted writing style makes it difficult for the court to make sense of the precise nature of the relief he is seeking. It is only through the court's thorough examination of [plaintiff's] motion papers and Complaint in whole that the ...