IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
April 10, 2008
MANUEL GARCIA, PETITIONER,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Jerome B. Simandle
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
Due to a typographical error in this Court's Opinion of April 9, 2008,
IT IS this 10th day of April, 2008, hereby ORDERED that the last sentence of footnote 2 on page 5 be deleted and the following text be inserted in its place:
The writ of coram nobis "is an 'extraordinary remedy'. . . generally sought to review a criminal conviction where a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is unavailable because petitioner is no longer serving a sentence." Porcelli v. United States, 404 F.3d 157, 158 (2d Cir. 2005) (quoting United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 511 (1954)).
JEROME B. SIMANDLE U.S. District Judge
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.