UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
March 18, 2008
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
WORLDWIDE INVESTIGATIONS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Mary L. Cooper United States District Judge
THE COURT ordering the plaintiffs to show cause why the action should not be designated as closed (dkt. entry no. 43); and it appearing, upon review of the docket in this action, that all of the claims asserted against all of the defendants herein have been resolved (see dkt. entry nos. 18-20, 35-36, 40-42 (consent judgments and stipulations)); and
THE PLAINTIFFS, in response, stating that they:
have reached settlements with each of the defendants in this matter. Plaintiffs do not object to this action being designated as closed, but request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce compliance with the consent injunctions and with the terms of the settlement agreements entered into between Plaintiffs and each of the defendants in this action (dkt. entry no. 44, Pls. Resp. to Order to Show Cause); and the Court thus intending to close the action under the terms suggested by the plaintiffs; and for good cause appearing, the Court will enter an appropriate order.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.