Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Copeland

September 21, 2007

IN THE MATTER OF RENEE COPELAND, POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF NEWARK.


On appeal from a Final Administrative Decision of the Merit System Board, DOP Docket No. 2006-3569.

Per curiam.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Submitted September 10, 2007

Before Judges Graves and Alvarez.

The issue in this case is whether the Merit System Board (Board) erred in dismissing Renee Copeland's untimely appeal from a Final Notice of Disciplinary Action (FNDA) that terminated Copeland's employment as a Newark police officer. Copeland contends the matter should be remanded to the Board for a "full hearing on her discharge from employment with the Newark Police Department." Based on our review of the record and the applicable law, we are convinced the Board's decision to dismiss Copeland's untimely appeal was neither arbitrary, capricious, nor unreasonable. Accordingly, we affirm.

Renee Copeland was employed by the Newark Police Department as a patrol officer from December 30, 1996, until June 1, 2005, when she was suspended for violating the police department's rules and regulations prohibiting the illegal use of drugs. On May 12, 2005, Copeland was required to provide a urine specimen for drug screening, which tested positive for cocaine and opiates. On June 1, 2005, Copeland was charged with violations of the police department's rules and regulations, and on June 2, 2005, the City of Newark issued a Preliminary Notice of Disciplinary Action that suspended Copeland, without pay, for an indefinite period of time. Following a departmental suspension hearing on June 20, 2005, Copeland's indefinite suspension pending resolution of the charges was sustained, and Copeland was served with an FNDA on June 30, 2005.

According to Copeland, she initially elected to have a final hearing regarding the charges filed against her, but she ultimately elected to waive the December 20, 2005, final hearing and requested a hearing in the Office of Administrative Law. Nevertheless, a final hearing was held on December 20, 2005, and an FNDA dated December 20, 2005, was served on Copeland and faxed to her attorney on December 28, 2005. The FNDA notified Copeland she had been found guilty of the charges against her and that her employment had been terminated effective June 1, 2005. The FNDA also advised Copeland she had the right to appeal and that any appeal had to be filed with the Board "within 20 days of receipt of this form." See N.J.S.A. 11A:2-15 ("[A]ny appeal from adverse actions . . . shall be made in writing to the board no later than 20 days from receipt of the final written determination of the appointing authority."); N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.8(a) ("An appeal from a Final Notice of Disciplinary Action must be filed within 20 days of receipt of the Notice by the employee."). Nevertheless, neither Copeland nor her attorney filed a timely appeal.

In a letter to the Board dated March 2, 2006, Copeland's attorney requested permission to file an untimely appeal due to "excusable neglect." The letter reads as follows:

Please be advised that I represent Renee Copeland in the above-captioned matter.

On December 28, 2005 a Final Notice of disciplinary Action was faxed to my office. (see enclosed).

On January 2, 2006 my secretary quit without notice. I was going through a transition without a secretary. During that time I was also on trial in Superior Court on several Criminal matters.

I employed a Secretary (Sidney Ruffin) on February 6, 2006. On Thursday, February 23, 2006 my secretary while going through Officer Copeland's file noticed that the letter of appeal had not been filed nor was it d[ai]ried in the calendar.

I am presently requesting excusable neglect of the Merit Board in allowing the Letter of Appeal to be filed out of time. In so far as Officer Copeland has ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.