Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Demauro v. Lindsay

August 29, 2007


On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, L-5057-03.

Per curiam.


Submitted August 21, 2007

Before Judges Lisa and Holston, Jr.

Defendant appeals from the trial court's order of June 19, 2006, granting plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of an April 3, 2006 order that had granted defendant's motion to vacate default. The court found that, upon reconsideration, defendant had not shown the requisite good cause to set aside default pursuant to Rule 4:43-3. We find no mistaken exercise of discretion and affirm.

The subject matter of this suit was a physical altercation that occurred on September 9, 2002, in which defendant, plaintiff's brother-in-law, punched plaintiff in the face, causing him injury. The two men apparently had a dispute over a debt that led to the physical altercation. Defendant was charged with simple assault. Represented by counsel, Gerald Tyne, Esquire, defendant pled guilty to the charge in municipal court, but subject to a provision that the plea would not be evidential in any civil proceeding. See R. 3:9-2.

Plaintiff filed the complaint in this case on July 15, 2003, alleging intentional tort and negligence. Defendant was served on July 31, 2003. The record is not clear as to the specific time when he took the papers to Tyne. In any event, Tyne advised defendant that he would not represent him in the civil suit, but he suggested that a request be made of defendant's homeowner's insurance company to enter a defense because the complaint contained a negligence count.

No answer was filed and default was entered on October 31, 2003. It was not until March 31, 2004 that Tyne wrote to defendant's carrier advising that his office "represents Thomas Lindsay," transmitting a copy of the complaint for review and consideration of entering a defense, and advising that "[i]t is my understanding from the plaintiff's attorney that default has already been entered and he is prepared to seek a judgment." Therefore, eight months elapsed between the time defendant was served and the date on which the papers were sent to his carrier with a request for entry of a defense. And that was done at a time when it was known that default had been entered many months earlier.

In addition to plaintiff's claim, defendant was in financial difficulties and unable to meet the mortgage obligations on his home, as a result of which foreclosure proceedings were begun. Tyne advised defendant to consider filing for bankruptcy and referred him to a bankruptcy attorney, Jerrold McDowell, Esquire. McDowell filed a Chapter 13 Petition for defendant on April 2, 2004.

On April 14, 2004, defendant's homeowner's carrier responded by letter directly to defendant, with a copy to Tyne, denying coverage, informing him the carrier would not provide a defense, and recommending that defendant retain counsel to protect his interests with respect to the allegations in the complaint. According to defendant, both McDowell and Tyne informed him that because of the pending bankruptcy, he would not be prejudiced by the lack of a defense because of the automatic stay against state court proceedings resulting from the pending bankruptcy action.

The bankruptcy petition was dismissed on September 13, 2004. Nevertheless, defendant took no action with regard to this case. On plaintiff's motion, an order was entered on September 17, 2004 restoring the action. During this same timeframe, McDowell became ill and died in November 2004, and defendant's wife experienced medical difficulties requiring surgery on her cervical spine. On December 22, 2004, plaintiff's attorney wrote to defendant, sending a copy of the order restoring the case.

In January 2005, plaintiff engaged the services of another bankruptcy attorney, Robert Johnson, Esquire. He also engaged the services of his present appellate counsel who, on February 7, 2005, filed a motion to vacate the default. The motion was argued and the judge reserved decision. Before the decision was rendered, on March 28, 2005, defendant's bankruptcy petition was restored. With that information passed on to the court, orders were entered on April 8, 2005 and May 13, 2005 denying without prejudice the motion to vacate default, pending further consideration when the automatic stay would no longer be in effect.

At some time prior to March 9, 2006, the bankruptcy proceeding was concluded. On March 9, 2006, defendant moved to vacate the default. Over objection, the motion was granted on April 3, 2006. Defendant filed an answer on April 13, 2006.

Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration on April 26, 2006. Oral argument was conducted on June 2, 2006. After reserving decision, the court issued an order, including a statement of reasons, granting reconsideration ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.