Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Geftic v. Livingston Board of Education

June 14, 2007

JULES GEFTIC, RICHARD GORE AND REGINA KAMLET BROOKS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
LIVINGSTON BOARD OF EDUCATION AND ROBERT GRADY, SUPERINTENDENT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.



On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, L-10096-02.

Per curiam.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Argued June 5, 2007

Before Judges Coburn, Axelrad and Gilroy.

Plaintiffs, Jules Geftic, Richard Gore, and Regina Kamlet Brooks appeal from the Law Division's August 19, 2005, summary judgment dismissing their complaint for hostile work environment and age discrimination under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -49.

On appeal, they offer the following contentions:

POINT ONE

BECAUSE PLAINTIFFS ESTABLISHED A PRIMA FACIE CASE BELOW, THE COURT ERRED IN GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT.

POINT TWO

THE FACTS IN THIS CASE COULD LEAD A REASONABLE JURY TO CONCLUDE THAT THE DISTRICT'S STATED REASON FOR THE TRANSFERS WAS A PRETEXT.

POINT THREE

THE COURT BELOW, WITHOUT MAKING ANY RELATED FACTUAL FINDINGS ERRONEOUSLY HELD THAT PLAINTIFFS DID NOT ESTABLISH A HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIM.

POINT FOUR

THE FACTS HEREIN ARE SUFFICIENT TO CONSTITUTE EGREGIOUS CONDUCT AND SUPPORT A ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.