Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lombardi v. County of Morris

May 25, 2007

LOMBARDI, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COUNTY OF MORRIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS,
KNOWLTON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
COUNTY OF MORRIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS,
FLAMMER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COUNTY OF MORRIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS,
RUIZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COUNTY OF MORRIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS,
FREID, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COUNTY OF MORRIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS,
O'BRIEN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COUNTY OF MORRIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS,



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Patty Shwartz United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER ON INFORMAL APPLICATION

This matter having come before the Court by way of submission filed May 22, 2007, regarding various discovery disputes; and the Court having conducted a hearing on the record on May 23, 2007; and the Court having considered the submission arguments and representations of counsel; and for the reasons set forth on the record on May 23, 2007; and for good cause shown,

IT IS ON THIS 24th day of May, 2007

ORDERED THAT:

1. In lieu of supplementing Rule 26 disclosures and interrogatories seeking the nature of the information in the possession of the persons identified therein, the defendants are granted up to two additional hours to be shared among them to depose the plaintiffs about the knowledge of the persons that they identified in their respective Rule 26 disclosures and interrogatory responses;

2. No later than May 30, 2007, the County shall produce each plaintiff's psychological and fitness for duty reports;

3. The County shall produce for inspection and for attorney's eyes only the original internal affairs files for each plaintiff;

4. No later than July 10, 2007, the plaintiffs shall provide the defendants with the names of each expert and the subject about which the expert is expected to opine;

5. With respect to plaintiff Lombardi's response to the County Rochford's interrogatories seeking factual information, no later than June 8, 2007, he shall provide (1) a supplemental response concerning the examples of alleged wrongful conduct that had been used to describe the January 2000 incident; (b) the citation to the statutes or regulations he contends defendants Corrente and McGrane failed to follow pertaining to discharge or termination of civil service employees; (c) the facts to support the statement that Sheriff Rochford "acquiesed in" or "ratified" any alleged wrongful conduct, and (d) the factual basis for each of the counts of the Complaint;

6. With respect to plaintiff Lombardi's response to defendant County Rochford's interrogatory seeking the address for Crumm & Forster and Starlo Electric, no later than June 8, 2007, plaintiff Lombardi shall provide such addresses;

7. No later than May 30, 2007, plaintiff Flammer shall re-serve its notice to produce, request for admissions, and supplemental notice to produce upon defendant McGrane and responses shall be provided no later than June 28, 2007;

8. No later than June 15, 2007, defendant County/Rochford shall respond to plaintiff' Flammer's interrogatories and requests for admissions;

9. No later than June 15, 2007, plaintiff Flammer shall provide responses to defendant Corrente's second set of supplemental interrogatories and Requests for Admissions, and third supplemental requests for interrogatories;

10. No later than June 8, 2007, plaintiff Flammer shall provide responses to defendant Corrente's third supplemental interrogatories;

11. Defendant Corrente's request that Mrs. Flammer provide medical records is denied;

12. No later than June 8, 2007, all plaintiffs shall provide their ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.