Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Creeden v. Home Depot
May 18, 2007
JOHN AND EILEEN CREEDEN, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THE HOME DEPOT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Greenaway, Jr., U.S.D.J.
On January 19, 2007, Magistrate Judge Madeline Cox Arleo filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), pursuant to Fed. Civ. P. 72(b) and L. Civ. R. 72.1(a)(2), wherein she recommended that dismissal be entered against John and Eileen Creeden as a sanction for failing to comply with various court orders. The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired, and no objections were submitted.
A magistrate judge's recommended disposition of a dispositive matter is subject to de novo review. In re U.S. Healthcare, 159 F.3d 142, 145-46 (3d Cir. 1998); Temptations, Inc. v. Wager, 26 F. Supp. 2d 740, 743 (D.N.J. 1998); see also Fed. R. Civ. P 72(b). This Court has reviewed the parties' submissions and the R&R under the appropriate de novo standard, and agrees with Magistrate Judge Arleo's analysis and conclusion. Therefore,
IT IS on this 18th day of May, 2007,
ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Arleo's R&R is adopted as the opinion of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that the case is dismissed with prejudice; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order be served on all parties within seven (7) days of the date of this Order.
JOSEPH A. GREENAWAY, JR., U.S.D.J.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw ...