A magistrate judge's recommended disposition of a dispositive
matter is subject to de novo review. In re U.S. Healthcare,
159 F.3d 142
, 145-46 (3d Cir. 1998); Temptations, Inc. v.
Wager, 26 F. Supp. 2d 740, 743 (D.N.J. 1998); see also
Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). This Court has reviewed the parties'
submissions and the R&R under the appropriate de novo
standard, and agrees with Magistrate Judge Arleo's analysis and
conclusion. Further, it appears that, as of December 14, 2005, plaintiff,
Elizabeth Huxtable, has not complied with her outstanding
discovery obligations. (Letter from Deborah B. Rosenthal, Esq. to
Magistrate Judge Madeline Cox Arleo (Dec. 14, 2005).) Therefore,
IT IS on this 22nd day of December, 2005,
ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Arleo's R&R is adopted as the
opinion of the Court; and