United States District Court, D. New Jersey
August 4, 2005.
MEDPOINTE HEALTHCARE INC., Plaintiff,
HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC., Defendant. MEDPOINTE HEALTHCARE INC., Plaintiff, v. MORTON GROVE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: JOHN HUGHES, Magistrate Judge
This matter comes before the Court upon Motions by Defendants,
Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. and Morton Grove Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., ("Defendants"), for leave to file Amended Answers and
Counterclaims [Docket entry #64 (Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc.),
Docket entry #34 (Morton Grove Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)],
returnable June 6, 2005; and Defendants seeking to allege the
same substantive claims against Plaintiff, MedPointe Healthcare,
Inc. ("Plaintiff") but assert additional facts as bases for those
claims; and Plaintiff having submitted opposition to part of the
motions and Defendants submitted a joint reply; and the Court
having reviewed the papers submitted by the parties and conducted
oral argument on June 6, 2005; and for the reasons set forth in
the accompanying Memorandum Opinion; and good cause having been
shown; IT IS on this 4th day of August, 2005,
ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to file Amended Answers and
Counterclaims are granted in part and denied in part in
accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion.
[Page 784, ]
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.