Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Brennan v. Kulick

May 13, 2005

WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, APPELLANT
v.
EUGENE KULICK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COMMISSIONER OF LITTLE FALLS FIRE DEPARTMENT AND AS COMMITTEEMAN FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE FALLS; JANICE SANDRI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF THE LITTLE FALLS FIRE DEPARTMENT AND AS COMMITTEEWOMAN FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE FALLS; RICK RICCIARDELLI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COMMITTEEMAN FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE FALLS; TERRY RYAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A COMMITTEEMAN FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE FALLS; CHRISTOPHER PARANY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COMMITTEEMAN FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE FALLS; WILLIAM WILK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR OR CLERK OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE FALLS; JAMES SEGRETO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HEAD OF THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE FALLS; TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE FALLS



On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil No. 01-cv-03837) District Judge: Hon. Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Cowen, Circuit Judge

PRECEDENTIAL

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) April 5, 2005

BEFORE: BARRY, AMBRO and COWEN, Circuit Judges

OPINION

William J. Brennan appeals the March 1, 2004 order of the District Court denying his renewed motion to vacate the District Court's previous order dated January 27, 2003, and dismissing his complaint with prejudice. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We will reverse and remand.

I.

This case has a long, tortured, and protracted procedural history. On August 13, 2001, Brennan, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, and various state laws.

The District Court promulgated a scheduling order on November 26, 2001. Defendants repeatedly complained that Plaintiff was not complying with his discovery obligations. In response, the District Court entered four separate discoveryrelated orders. *fn1 The last of these orders was dated December 19, 2002, and sanctioned Brennan for his refusal to follow the previous orders. Paragraph 1 of this order instructed Brennan to pay a monetary sanction by December 23, 2002.

Brennan failed to pay the sanction on time. The District Court therefore dismissed his complaint without prejudice by order dated January 27, 2003. The order states in relevant part:

1. That plaintiff's Complaint shall be and the same is hereby dismissed without prejudice because of plaintiff's failure to comply with paragraph (1) of the December 19, 2002 Case Management Order;

2. That if plaintiff fails to comply with the December 19, 2002 Case Management Order and if the Complaint is not reinstated within 30 days, the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice upon application of defendants;

(App. at 51.)

Brennan retained present counsel on February ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.