Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Aparin v. County of Gloucester

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division


October 29, 2001

DAWN E. APARIN, DOUGLAS A. DANIELS, EDWARD DWYER, ROSE LEE FLEMING, JOSEPH F. GORECKI, ELMER HAMMEL, DAVID R. HUBERT, JR., ROBERT H. JOHNSON, ADRIAN LUGO, JR. AND GEORGE W. WAGNER, JR., PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS,
v.
COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER AND BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY, DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS, COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER AND BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS/ APPELLANTS,
v.
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL JANICE MITCHELL MINTZ, COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.

Before Judges Wallace, Jr., Carchman and Wells. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Gloucester County, GLO-L-1306-99, whose opinion is reported at ___ N.J. Super. ___.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Per Curiam.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Argued October 2, 2001

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Holston in his opinion reported at ____ N.J. Super. _____ (Law Div. 2001). We are satisfied that the findings of fact are supported by substantial credible evidence in the record and find no sound reason or justification to interfere with them. See Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 484 (1974).

20011029


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.