Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

WILLIAM G. MAHONEY ROY S. DE LON v. RFE/RL </h1> <p class="docCourt"> </p> <p> February 28, 1995 </p> <p class="case-parties"> <b>WILLIAM G. MAHONEY; ROY S. DE LON, APPELLEES<br><br>v.<br><br>RFE/RL, INC., APPELLANT</b><br><br> </p> <div class="caseCopy"> <div class="facLeaderBoard"> <script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "ca-pub-1233285632737842"; /* FACLeaderBoard */ google_ad_slot = "8524463142"; google_ad_width = 728; google_ad_height = 90; //--> </script> <script type="text/javascript" src=""> </script> </div class="facLeaderBoard"> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p><br> Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (91cv01842)</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> Before: Silberman, Henderson, and Randolph, Circuit Judges.</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> Randolph, Circuit Judge;</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> FOR PUBLICATION</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> Argued November 23, 1994</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge Randolph.</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> If an American corporation operating in a foreign country would have to "violate the laws" of that country in order to comply with the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. Section(s) 623(f)(1), the company need not comply with the Act. The question here is whether this "foreign laws" exception in Section(s) 623(f)(1) applies when the overseas company, in order to comply with the Act, would have to breach a collective bargaining agreement with foreign unions.</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> RFE/RL, Inc. is a Delaware non-profit corporation. It is funded but not controlled by the federal government, Ralis v. RFE/RL, Inc., 770 F.2d 1121, 1125 (D.C. Cir. 1985), and is best known for its broadcast services, Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty. RFE/RL's principal place of business is Munich, Germany. In 1982, the company entered into a collective bargaining agreement with unions representing its employees in Munich. One of the provisions of the labor contract, modeled after a nation-wide agreement in the German broadcast industry, required employees to retire at age sixty-five. <a href="#D*fn1" name="S*fn1">*fn1</a> In 1982, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act had no extraterritorial reach and, from all that appears, this portion of the RFE/RL collective bargaining agreement was entirely lawful. See Ralis v. RFE/RL, Inc., 770 F.2d at 1124.</p></div> <div class="facAdFloatLeft"> <script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "ca-pub-1233285632737842"; /* FACContentLeftSkyscraperWide */ google_ad_slot = "1266897617"; google_ad_width = 160; google_ad_height = 600; //--> </script> <script type="text/javascript" src=""></script> </div class="facLeaderBoard"> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> Congress amended the Act in 1984 to cover American citizens working for American corporations overseas. Pub. L. No. 98-459, 98 Stat. 1767, 1792-93 (codified as amended at 29 U.S.C. Section(s) 623(h), 630(f)). RFE/RL initially thought its American employees in Munich would therefore no longer have to retire at the age of sixty-five, as the collective bargaining agreement provided, and could continue to work until they were seventy if they so chose. <a href="#D*fn2" name="S*fn2">*fn2</a> In order to implement this understanding, the company applied to the "Works Council" for limited exemptions from its contractual obligation. Works Councils (Betriebsr¬Ąte) exist in all German firms with twenty or more workers. See Christopher S. Allen, Principles of the Economic System, in Germany and Its Basic Law: Past, Present and Future; A German-American Symposium 339, 348 (Paul Kirchhof & Donald P. Kommers eds., 1993). They are bodies elected by both unionized and nonunionized employees. Their duties include insuring that management adheres to all provisions of union contracts. Departures from contractual requirements are illegal without the Works Council's approval. Rejecting RFE/RL's requests, the Works Council here determined that allowing only those employees who were American citizens to work past the age of sixty-five would violate not only the mandatory retirement provision, but also the collective bargaining agreement's provision forbidding discrimination on the basis of nationality.</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> RFE/RL appealed the Works Council's decisions with respect to several employees, including plaintiff De Lon, to the Munich Labor Court and lost. The Labor Court agreed with the Works Council that RFE/RL must uniformly enforce the mandatory retirement provisions because exemptions would unfairly discriminate against German workers. The Labor Court also held that the company's retaining employees over the age of sixty-five despite the collective bargaining agreement would be illegal. RFE/RL negotiated with the unions to delete the mandatory retirement provision from the collective bargaining agreement, but to no avail. The company terminated plaintiff De Lon in 1987, and plaintiff Mahoney in 1988. Both plaintiffs were working for the company in Munich, both are United States citizens, and both were discharged pursuant to the labor contract because they had reached the age of sixty-five. The parties agree that RFE/RL thereby violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act unless the "foreign laws" exception applied. The Act prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of age. 29 U.S.C. Section(s) 623. "Employee" includes "any individual who is a citizen of the United States employed by an employer in a workplace in a foreign country" (29 U.S.C. Section(s) 630(f)); and it is common ground that the Act covers RFE/RL.</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court found that company liable for violating the Act, ruling that the "foreign laws" exception (29 U.S.C. Section(s) 623(f)(1)) did not apply to breaches of collective bargaining agreements. Mahoney v. RFE/RL, Inc., 818 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1992). The case then proceeded to trial on the issue of damages. A final judgment was entered May 10, 1993. The court amended this in a Revised Order, entered June 8, 1993, and another Order, entered July 7, 1993. RFE/RL appeals the judgment establishing its liability and the award of damages for violating the Act. Mahoney and De Lon cross-appeal the judgment setting the amount of their damages. The "foreign laws" exception to the Act states:</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> It shall not be unlawful for an employer, employment agency, or labor organization-</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"> <p> (1) to take any action otherwise prohibited under subsections (a), (b), (c), or (e) of this section where ... such practices involve an employee in a workplace in a foreign country, and compliance with such subsections would cause such employer, or a corporation controlled by such ...</p> </div> </div> </div> <div id="caseToolTip" class="caseToolTip" style="display: none;"> <div class="toolTipHead"> </div> <div class="toolTipContent"> <p> Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion. To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase, you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents and concurrences that accompany the decision. Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion, there may not be additional text. </p> </div> <div class="toolTipFoot"> </div> </div> <br /> <div class="buyNowContainer"> <div class="price"> <img src="/assets/img/findACase/bracket-left.png" alt="" /> <span>Buy This Entire Record For $7.95</span> <img src="/assets/img/findACase/pdf.png" class="pdf" alt="" /> <img src="/assets/img/findACase/bracket-right.png" alt="" /> </div> <div class="details"> <p> Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,<br /> docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case. </p> <p> <a class="showCaseToolTip">Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.</a> </p> </div> <div class="buttons"> <input type="submit" name="FAC$cphMainContent$btnBuyNowBottom" value="Buy Now" id="btnBuyNowBottom" class="btn-cart-buy-now btn btn-fac btnOrderTop" data-doc-short-name="19950228_0000049.cdc.htm" data-doc-title="<title> WILLIAM G. MAHONEY ROY S. DE LON v. RFE/RL" /> <input type="submit" name="FAC$cphMainContent$btnAddToCartBottom" value="Add To Cart" id="btnAddToCartBottom" class="btn-cart-add btn btn-fac btnOrderTop" data-doc-short-name="19950228_0000049.cdc.htm" data-doc-title="<title> WILLIAM G. MAHONEY ROY S. DE LON v. RFE/RL" /> </div> </div> <input type="hidden" name="FAC$cphMainContent$hfDocID" id="hfDocID" value="\FCT\CDC\1995\19950228_0000049.CDC.htm" /> <input type="hidden" name="FAC$cphMainContent$hfDocTitle" id="hfDocTitle" value="<title> WILLIAM G. MAHONEY ROY S. DE LON v. RFE/RL" /> <input type="hidden" name="FAC$cphMainContent$hfDocShortName" id="hfDocShortName" value="19950228_0000049.CDC.htm" /> </div> <div id="pnlGrayBarBottom" class="grayBar"> <span class="grayBarLeft"></span><span class="grayBarRight"></span> </div> <div id="footer"> <p> <a href="">Home</a> <span>/</span> <a href=""> Our Sources</a> <span>/</span> <a href="">About Us</a> <span>/</span> <a href="">FAQs</a> <span>/</span> <a href="">Advanced Search</a> </p> <p> copyright 2018 LRC, Inc. <a href="">About Us</a> </p> <p> <span id="privacyPolicy"><a href="">PRIVACY POLICY</a></span> </p> <div id="crosslink" style="width: 100%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><a href=""><img src="" alt="Litigation Pathfinder - practical legal advice and comprehensive research resources made affordable" style="width: 375px;" /></a></div> </div> </div> </form> </body> </html>