Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Carr v. Burgess

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division


Decided: April 5, 1993.

JOYCE CARR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ARTHUR W. BURGESS, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF H. THOMAS CARR, BARBARA CARR, MICHAEL T. CARR, KATHLEEN P. CARR AND TIMOTHY F. CARR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND BERLY INVESTMENT CO.; LESLIE GRABOWSKI, JEFFREY KIRSCH, ROBERT ELKINS, RAYMOND BUCK AND AQUAMARINE DEVELOPMENT, INC., INTERVENORS

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Middlesex County, whose decision is reported at 264 N.J. Super. 191, 623 A.2d 1384 (Ch.Div.1993).

Michels, Bilder and Wallace.

Per Curiam

[264 NJSuper Page 10] The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Epstein in his opinion reported at 264 N.J. Super. 191, 623 A.2d 1384 (Ch.Div.1993). We are satisfied that the findings of fact are supported by substantial

[264 NJSuper Page 11]

credible evidence in the record and find no sound reason or justification to interfere with them. See Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974).

19930405


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.