Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Carr v. Burgess

Decided: April 5, 1993.

JOYCE CARR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ARTHUR W. BURGESS, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF H. THOMAS CARR, BARBARA CARR, MICHAEL T. CARR, KATHLEEN P. CARR AND TIMOTHY F. CARR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND BERLY INVESTMENT CO.; LESLIE GRABOWSKI, JEFFREY KIRSCH, ROBERT ELKINS, RAYMOND BUCK AND AQUAMARINE DEVELOPMENT, INC., INTERVENORS



On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Middlesex County, whose decision is reported at 264 N.J. Super. 191, 623 A.2d 1384 (Ch.Div.1993).

Michels, Bilder and Wallace.

Per Curiam

[264 NJSuper Page 10] The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Epstein in his opinion reported at 264 N.J. Super. 191, 623 A.2d 1384 (Ch.Div.1993). We are satisfied that the findings of fact are supported by substantial

credible evidence in the record and find no sound reason or justification to interfere with them. See Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 6 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.