Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kostelanetz, Ritholz, Tigue & Fink v. Himmelwright

Decided: March 9, 1993.

KOSTELANETZ, RITHOLZ, TIGUE & FINK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
DR. VICTOR HIMMELWRIGHT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County.

Before Judges J. H. Coleman and A. M. Stein.

Per Curiam

Per Curiam

The order dismissing counts three and seven of defendant's counterclaim, alleging that plaintiff attorneys violated the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -48, is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Ironson in his oral decision of June 14, 1991. See Vort v. Hollander, 257 N.J. Super. 56, 61-63, 607 A.2d 1339 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 130 N.J. 599 (1992).

The order dismissing the remaining counts of defendant's counterclaim and entering summary judgment in favor of plaintiff is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Alley's written opinion reported as Kostelanetz, Ritholz v. Himmelwright, 254 N.J. Super. 249, 603 A.2d 168 (Law Div. 1991).

Affirmed.

Disposition

Affirmed.

19930309 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.