Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Crespo v. Stapf

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division


Decided: May 23, 1991.

NELSON CRESPO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEF STAPF, JOSEF STAPF MASCHINENBEAU, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SCHACHNE FEATHER COMPANY, HUDSON FEATHER COMPANY, HUDSON FEATHER AND DOWN PRODUCTS, INC., PURO DOWN INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY CORP., PURO INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS. JACK S. PIERMONT AND LERNER AND PIERMONT, ESQS., INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, whose opinion is reported at 242 N.J. Super. 254, 576 A.2d 346 (Law Div.1990).

Michels, Brody and Gruccio.

Per Curiam

[248 NJSuper Page 349] We affirm the summary judgment of the Law Division entered in favor of defendants Josef Stapf and Josef Stapf

[248 NJSuper Page 350]

Maschinenbeau dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Nelson Crespo in this product liability action substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Wefing in her written opinion which is reported as Crespo v. Stapf, 242 N.J. Super. 254, 576 A.2d 346 (Law Div.1990). We are satisfied from our study of the record and the arguments presented that the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants and that all of the issues of law raised are clearly without merit. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). See also Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., 900 F.2d 686 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, U.S. , 111 S. Ct. 246, 112 L. Ed. 2d 204 (1990).

Affirmed.

19910523


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.